IETF Last Call Review of draft-ietf-mpls-mna-nrp-selector-03
review-ietf-mpls-mna-nrp-selector-03-genart-lc-gurbani-2026-03-25-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-mpls-mna-nrp-selector
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 07)
Type IETF Last Call Review
Team General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart)
Deadline 2026-04-06
Requested 2026-03-23
Authors Tony Li , Vishnu Pavan Beeram , John Drake , Tarek Saad , Israel Meilik
I-D last updated 2026-06-17 (Latest revision 2026-06-11)
Completed reviews Rtgdir IETF Last Call review of -03 by Susan Hares (diff)
Secdir IETF Last Call review of -03 by Shawn M Emery (diff)
Genart IETF Last Call review of -03 by Vijay K. Gurbani (diff)
Opsdir IETF Last Call review of -03 by Xiao Min (diff)
Intdir Telechat review of -04 by Jen Linkova (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Vijay K. Gurbani
State Completed
Request IETF Last Call review on draft-ietf-mpls-mna-nrp-selector by General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) Assigned
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/zZLhSI9oPsm4uim3ajwLjaZ5VW0
Reviewed revision 03 (document currently at 07)
Result Ready w/nits
Completed 2026-03-25
review-ietf-mpls-mna-nrp-selector-03-genart-lc-gurbani-2026-03-25-00
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.

For more information, please see the FAQ at

<https://wiki.ietf.org/en/group/gen/GenArtFAQ>.

Document: draft-ietf-mpls-mna-nrp-selector-??
Reviewer: Vijay K. Gurbani
Review Date: 2026-03-25
IETF LC End Date: 2026-04-06
IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat

Summary: The draft is ready for publication as a Standards Track Document with
one nit.

Major issues: 0

Minor issues: 0

Nits/editorial comments: 1

Nits:
1) In Section 2.3, the 20-bit Entropy and NRP Selector -- the 20th bit ends up
straddling the second NRPS field, it does not end on the field boundary as
shown in the figure.  Is that intended?

Thanks,

- vijay