Last Call Review of draft-ietf-mpls-rfc6374-sr-11
review-ietf-mpls-rfc6374-sr-11-genart-lc-even-2024-09-01-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-mpls-rfc6374-sr
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 17)
Type IETF Last Call Review
Team General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart)
Deadline 2024-09-06
Requested 2024-08-23
Authors Rakesh Gandhi , Clarence Filsfils , Daniel Voyer , Stefano Salsano , Mach Chen
I-D last updated 2025-05-08 (Latest revision 2024-10-17)
Completed reviews Rtgdir Early review of -08 by Zhaohui (Jeffrey) Zhang (diff)
Tsvart IETF Last Call review of -11 by Marcus Ihlar (diff)
Opsdir IETF Last Call review of -11 by Dhruv Dhody (diff)
Secdir IETF Last Call review of -11 by Ned Smith (diff)
Genart IETF Last Call review of -11 by Roni Even (diff)
Intdir Telechat review of -13 by Brian Haberman (diff)
Opsdir Telechat review of -13 by Dhruv Dhody (diff)
Tsvart Telechat review of -14 by Marcus Ihlar (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Roni Even
State Completed
Request IETF Last Call review on draft-ietf-mpls-rfc6374-sr by General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) Assigned
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/4E802yr4GoW6vpMbokFCvy6LPuY
Reviewed revision 11 (document currently at 17)
Result Ready w/nits
Completed 2024-09-01
review-ietf-mpls-rfc6374-sr-11-genart-lc-even-2024-09-01-00
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.

For more information, please see the FAQ at

<https://wiki.ietf.org/en/group/gen/GenArtFAQ>.

Document: draft-ietf-mpls-rfc6374-sr-??
Reviewer: Roni Even
Review Date: 2024-09-01
IETF LC End Date: 2024-09-06
IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat

Summary:
The document is ready to be published as a standard track rFC with nits

Major issues:

Minor issues:

Nits/editorial comments:
In section 4.2.2 first paragraph “ the response messages are preferred to be
sent back in-band on the same link ”  do you mean “the response messages SHOULD
be sent …”