Telechat Review of draft-ietf-mpls-rfc8287-len-clarification-04
review-ietf-mpls-rfc8287-len-clarification-02-genart-telechat-robles-2019-08-08-01

Request Review of draft-ietf-mpls-rfc8287-len-clarification
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 04)
Type Telechat Review
Team General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart)
Deadline 2019-08-06
Requested 2019-07-31
Authors Nagendra Kumar Nainar , Carlos Pignataro , Faisal Iqbal , Sasha Vainshtein
I-D last updated 2019-08-09
Completed reviews Rtgdir Last Call review of -02 by Susan Hares (diff)
Genart Last Call review of -02 by Ines Robles (diff)
Opsdir Last Call review of -02 by Joel Jaeggli (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -02 by Kyle Rose (diff)
Genart Telechat review of -04 by Ines Robles
Assignment Reviewer Ines Robles
State Completed
Request Telechat review on draft-ietf-mpls-rfc8287-len-clarification by General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) Assigned
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/ifFzugb3iK6YfgH3-_2wYx6QYeE
Reviewed revision 04
Result Ready
Completed 2019-08-09
review-ietf-mpls-rfc8287-len-clarification-02-genart-telechat-robles-2019-08-08-01
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your
document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft.

For more information, please see the FAQ at

<https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Document: draft-ietf-mpls-rfc8287-len-clarification-??
Reviewer: Ines Robles
Review Date: 2019-08-09
IETF LC End Date: None
IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat

Summary:

I believe the draft is technically good. This document is well written.

The document updates RFC8287 by clarifying the length for the following Segment
ID Sub-TLVs: IPv4 IGP-Prefix Segment ID Sub-TLV, IPv6 IGP-Prefix Segment ID
Sub-TLV and IGP-Adjacency Segment ID Sub-TLV.

version 4 addresses my comments done for version 2.

Major issues: Not found

Minor issues: Not found

Nits/editorial comments: Not found