Last Call Review of draft-ietf-mpls-ri-rsvp-frr-07
review-ietf-mpls-ri-rsvp-frr-07-genart-lc-enghardt-2019-10-30-00
| Request | Review of | draft-ietf-mpls-ri-rsvp-frr |
|---|---|---|
| Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 22) | |
| Type | Last Call Review | |
| Team | General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart) | |
| Deadline | 2019-11-05 | |
| Requested | 2019-10-22 | |
| Authors | Chandrasekar R , Tarek Saad , Ina Minei , Dante Pacella | |
| I-D last updated | 2019-10-30 | |
| Completed reviews |
Secdir Early review of -17
by David Mandelberg
(diff)
Rtgdir Early review of -18 by Ketan Talaulikar (diff) Rtgdir Last Call review of -05 by Julien Meuric (diff) Genart Last Call review of -07 by Reese Enghardt (diff) Rtgdir Last Call review of -16 by Carlos Pignataro (diff) |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Reese Enghardt |
| State | Completed | |
| Request | Last Call review on draft-ietf-mpls-ri-rsvp-frr by General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) Assigned | |
| Posted at | https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/w4OEk-qCV5xFprZA0I_is8RHSTg | |
| Reviewed revision | 07 (document currently at 22) | |
| Result | Ready w/nits | |
| Completed | 2019-10-30 |
review-ietf-mpls-ri-rsvp-frr-07-genart-lc-enghardt-2019-10-30-00
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For more information, please see the FAQ at <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Document: draft-ietf-mpls-ri-rsvp-frr-07 Reviewer: Theresa Enghardt Review Date: 2019-10-30 IETF LC End Date: 2019-11-05 IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat Summary: This draft is basically ready for publication, but has nits that should be fixed before publication. Major issues: None. Minor issues: None. Nits/editorial comments: The abstract is hard to parse and could be improved by fixing the following nits. OLD: "Facility backup method allows" NEW: "The facility backup method allows" OLD: "The many-to-one nature of local repair technique" NEW: "The many-to-one nature of this local repair technique" OLD: "This document enumerates facility backup procedures in RFC 4090" NEW: "This document enumerates the facility backup procedures in RFC 4090" [or "several facility backup procedures", if not all procedures are enumerated here] OLD: "and hence make facility backup method refresh-interval dependent." NEW: "and hence make the facility backup method refresh-interval dependent." OLD: "The RSVP-TE extensions defined in this document will enhance" NEW: "This document defines RSVP-TE extensions to enhance" Are "facility backup method", "facility backup procedure" and "facility backup protection mechanism" all the same thing? Please consider using only a single term to avoid confusion. Please double-check the use of definite and indefinite articles in the rest of the document as well.