Last Call Review of draft-ietf-mpls-rmr-11
review-ietf-mpls-rmr-11-rtgdir-lc-hares-2019-08-29-00
Request | Review of | draft-ietf-mpls-rmr |
---|---|---|
Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 14) | |
Type | Last Call Review | |
Team | Routing Area Directorate (rtgdir) | |
Deadline | 2019-08-30 | |
Requested | 2019-08-14 | |
Requested by | Deborah Brungard | |
Authors | Kireeti Kompella , Luis M. Contreras | |
I-D last updated | 2019-08-29 | |
Completed reviews |
Rtgdir Early review of -09
by Susan Hares
(diff)
Rtgdir Last Call review of -11 by Susan Hares (diff) Tsvart Last Call review of -12 by Colin Perkins (diff) Genart Last Call review of -12 by Francis Dupont (diff) Secdir Last Call review of -12 by Derek Atkins (diff) Opsdir Last Call review of -12 by Nagendra Kumar Nainar (diff) |
|
Comments |
Prep for Last Call. |
|
Assignment | Reviewer | Susan Hares |
State | Completed | |
Request | Last Call review on draft-ietf-mpls-rmr by Routing Area Directorate Assigned | |
Posted at | https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtg-dir/NTQBXTd5N9AcrzWP5Kkwc9oprdg | |
Reviewed revision | 11 (document currently at 14) | |
Result | Has nits | |
Completed | 2019-08-29 |
review-ietf-mpls-rmr-11-rtgdir-lc-hares-2019-08-29-00
Authors: Thank you for continuing to refine this document. Status: editorial nits: #1 - Section 3.3 paragraph 1, last sentence old/RMR is primarly intended for operation at the packet layer; however, parallel links at hte lambda or fiber layer result in parallel links at the packet layer./ question: Did you want to say /may result/ intead of /result/ #2 - Section 3.7 - Would be easier to read if you included a diagram. #3 - Section 4.4 - Would be easier to read if you included a diagram Rational for requesting diagram: You are explaining the technology that requires additional TLVs in other protocols (IGPS) #4 - Section 5 - (editorial only) This one section jars the reader to ask "why am I bothered with this section." I understand why you want to make this clear that this point. However, in section 1 you lay out the protocols. Do you also want to do this here? Either choice works technically. However this document is dually focused: summary of RMR concepts to those writing future specifications and RMR to those desiring to install these solutions. Does this section help those desiring to install these solutions to find the other document?