Last Call Review of draft-ietf-mpls-seamless-mcast-15
review-ietf-mpls-seamless-mcast-15-secdir-lc-salowey-2015-02-05-00
Request | Review of | draft-ietf-mpls-seamless-mcast |
---|---|---|
Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 17) | |
Type | Last Call Review | |
Team | Security Area Directorate (secdir) | |
Deadline | 2015-02-02 | |
Requested | 2015-01-22 | |
Authors | Yakov Rekhter , Eric C. Rosen , Rahul Aggarwal , Thomas Morin , Irene Grosclaude , Nicolai Leymann , Samir Saad | |
I-D last updated | 2015-02-05 | |
Completed reviews |
Genart Last Call review of -15 by Vijay K. Gurbani
(diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -15 by Joseph A. Salowey (diff) Rtgdir Early review of -15 by Stig Venaas (diff) |
|
Assignment | Reviewer | Joseph A. Salowey |
State | Completed | |
Request | Last Call review on draft-ietf-mpls-seamless-mcast by Security Area Directorate Assigned | |
Reviewed revision | 15 (document currently at 17) | |
Result | Ready | |
Completed | 2015-02-05 |
review-ietf-mpls-seamless-mcast-15-secdir-lc-salowey-2015-02-05-00
I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments. I think the document is ready. This document describes procedures for building point-to-multipoint service LSPs. My background in this area is not very deep. I have read through the document and the references in the security considerations section. This guidance seems good, however the document describes a lot of procedures and its not obviously clear what part of the procedures are security impacting. Its not clear to me that this is a problem. Thanks, Joe