Last Call Review of draft-ietf-mpls-self-ping-04
review-ietf-mpls-self-ping-04-genart-lc-housley-2015-09-25-00
Request | Review of | draft-ietf-mpls-self-ping |
---|---|---|
Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 06) | |
Type | Last Call Review | |
Team | General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart) | |
Deadline | 2015-10-02 | |
Requested | 2015-09-23 | |
Authors | Ron Bonica , Ina Minei , Michael Conn , Dante Pacella , Luis Tomotaki | |
I-D last updated | 2015-09-25 | |
Completed reviews |
Genart Last Call review of -04
by Russ Housley
(diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -04 by Leif Johansson (diff) Opsdir Last Call review of -04 by Bert Wijnen (diff) Rtgdir Early review of -04 by John Drake (diff) |
|
Assignment | Reviewer | Russ Housley |
State | Completed | |
Request | Last Call review on draft-ietf-mpls-self-ping by General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) Assigned | |
Reviewed revision | 04 (document currently at 06) | |
Result | Ready | |
Completed | 2015-09-25 |
review-ietf-mpls-self-ping-04-genart-lc-housley-2015-09-25-00
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at < http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document: draft-ietf-mpls-self-ping-04 Reviewer: Russ Housley Review Date: 2014-09-25 IETF LC End Date: 2014-10-02 IESG Telechat date: unknown Summary: Ready. Major Concerns: None. Minor Concerns: None. Other Comments: At the end of Section 1, the document says: "Each protocol listens on its own UDP port and executes its own unique procedures." What does "unique" mean here? What changes if "unique" is dropped from this sentence? Would it be more obvious to the reader the purpose of Section 6 if it were turned into an appendix?