Skip to main content

Telechat Review of draft-ietf-mpls-spring-inter-domain-oam-17

Request Review of draft-ietf-mpls-spring-inter-domain-oam
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 20)
Type Telechat Review
Team Ops Directorate (opsdir)
Deadline 2024-06-11
Requested 2024-05-24
Authors Shraddha Hegde , Kapil Arora , Mukul Srivastava , Samson Ninan , Nagendra Kumar Nainar
I-D last updated 2024-06-10
Completed reviews Genart Last Call review of -16 by Peter E. Yee (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -14 by Chris M. Lonvick (diff)
Rtgdir Last Call review of -13 by Stig Venaas (diff)
Opsdir Last Call review of -14 by Qin Wu (diff)
Opsdir Telechat review of -17 by Qin Wu (diff)
Tsvart Last Call review of -14 by Michael Tüxen (diff)
Rtgdir Early review of -05 by Michael Richardson (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Qin Wu
State Completed
Request Telechat review on draft-ietf-mpls-spring-inter-domain-oam by Ops Directorate Assigned
Posted at
Reviewed revision 17 (document currently at 20)
Result Has issues
Completed 2024-06-10
I have reviewed this document as part of the Operational directorate's ongoing
effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG.  These
comments were written with the intent of improving the operational aspects of
the IETF drafts. Comments that are not addressed in last call may be included
in AD reviews during the IESG review.  Document editors and WG chairs should
treat these comments just like any other last call comments.

This document extends MPLS Ping and Traceroute mechanism from one single domain
to multi-domain, multi-AS and provide end to end path tracing and reachability
checking across SR MPLS data plane.

I have read the v-(17), my comments on v-(14) in the previous OPS-DIR review
have been addressed. Thanks for rearranging sectgion 6,7,8. However one
additional comment I have is A-flag is well specified in section 4.4, however
it is not clear on how A-flag is used in the detailed procedure and detailed
example section.