Last Call Review of draft-ietf-mpls-sr-over-ip-02
review-ietf-mpls-sr-over-ip-02-rtgdir-lc-gray-2019-01-28-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-mpls-sr-over-ip
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 07)
Type Last Call Review
Team Routing Area Directorate (rtgdir)
Deadline 2019-01-25
Requested 2019-01-09
Requested by Deborah Brungard
Authors Xiaohu Xu , Stewart Bryant , Adrian Farrel , Syed Hassan , Wim Henderickx , Zhenbin Li
I-D last updated 2019-01-28
Completed reviews Rtgdir Last Call review of -02 by Eric Gray (diff)
Opsdir Last Call review of -02 by Al Morton (diff)
Genart Last Call review of -02 by Robert Sparks (diff)
Tsvart Last Call review of -03 by Martin Stiemerling (diff)
Comments 
Prep for Last Call.
Assignment Reviewer Eric Gray
State Completed
Request Last Call review on draft-ietf-mpls-sr-over-ip by Routing Area Directorate Assigned
Reviewed revision 02 (document currently at 07)
Result Ready
Completed 2019-01-28
review-ietf-mpls-sr-over-ip-02-rtgdir-lc-gray-2019-01-28-00
Reviewer: Eric Gray
Review result: Ready

I have been selected as the Routing Directorate reviewer for this draft. The
Routing Directorate seeks to review all routing or routing-related drafts as
they pass through IETF last call and IESG review, and sometimes on special
request. The purpose of the review is to provide assistance to the Routing ADs.
For more information about the Routing Directorate, please see
​http://trac.tools.ietf.org/area/rtg/trac/wiki/RtgDir

Although these comments are primarily for the use of the Routing ADs, it would
be helpful if you could consider them along with any other IETF Last Call
comments that you receive, and strive to resolve them through discussion or by
updating the draft.

Document: draft-ietf-mpls-sr-over-ip-02
Reviewer: Eric Gray
Review Date: 25 January, 2019
IETF LC End Date: 25 January, 2019
Intended Status: Proposed Standard

Summary:
This document is ready for publication.

Comments:
    The document is well written and relatively easy to read.  It was also
    short and to the point.  Thanks to the authors for making this an easy
    review.

Major Issues:
    No major issues found.

Minor Issues:
    No minor issues found.

Nits:
    None.

Eric Gray