Early Review of draft-ietf-mpls-static-yang-09
review-ietf-mpls-static-yang-09-yangdoctors-early-bierman-2019-07-22-00
| Request | Review of | draft-ietf-mpls-static-yang-09 |
|---|---|---|
| Requested revision | 09 (document currently at 14) | |
| Type | Early Review | |
| Team | YANG Doctors (yangdoctors) | |
| Deadline | 2019-07-31 | |
| Requested | 2019-07-10 | |
| Requested by | Tarek Saad | |
| Authors | Tarek Saad , Rakesh Gandhi , Xufeng Liu , Vishnu Pavan Beeram , Igor Bryskin | |
| I-D last updated | 2024-09-02 (Latest revision 2024-03-01) | |
| Completed reviews |
Yangdoctors Early review of -09
by Andy Bierman
(diff)
|
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Andy Bierman |
| State | Completed | |
| Request | Early review on draft-ietf-mpls-static-yang by YANG Doctors Assigned | |
| Posted at | https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/yang-doctors/P9JrBa4S-dMBpw3F4p0FFtbiHC0 | |
| Reviewed revision | 09 (document currently at 14) | |
| Result | Ready w/nits | |
| Completed | 2019-07-22 |
review-ietf-mpls-static-yang-09-yangdoctors-early-bierman-2019-07-22-00
- No pyang warnings or errors - No noticeable typos or omissions Nits: - contact info includes WG Chairs; this was removed in the new usage guidelines Questions: - The ietf-mpls-static-extended module is used instead of a YANG feature. Is the generic name 'extended' appropriate? What will the next module used to avoid a YANG feature be called? extended2?