Skip to main content

Last Call Review of draft-ietf-mpls-summary-frr-rsvpte-07
review-ietf-mpls-summary-frr-rsvpte-07-secdir-lc-lonvick-2019-12-24-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-mpls-summary-frr-rsvpte
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 09)
Type Last Call Review
Team Security Area Directorate (secdir)
Deadline 2019-12-25
Requested 2019-12-11
Authors Mike Taillon , Tarek Saad , Rakesh Gandhi , Abhishek Deshmukh , Markus Jork , Vishnu Pavan Beeram
Draft last updated 2019-12-24
Completed reviews Rtgdir Last Call review of -05 by Andrew G. Malis (diff)
Tsvart Last Call review of -07 by Gorry Fairhurst (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -07 by Chris M. Lonvick (diff)
Genart Last Call review of -07 by Reese Enghardt (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Chris M. Lonvick
State Completed
Review review-ietf-mpls-summary-frr-rsvpte-07-secdir-lc-lonvick-2019-12-24
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/HnyuJNE34Xh4Rv2vf5btsV-o26E
Reviewed revision 07 (document currently at 09)
Result Ready
Completed 2019-12-16
review-ietf-mpls-summary-frr-rsvpte-07-secdir-lc-lonvick-2019-12-24-00
Hi,

I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's 
ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. 
These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security 
area directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these 
comments just like any other last call comments.

The summary of the review is READY.

The Security Considerations section is a bit thin, but it appropriately 
addresses the issue that an implementation will increase the attack 
surface of an RSVP object. Since this is an extension to the protocol, 
the security considerations sections of the controlling RFCs are identified.

I skimmed the draft a few times but did not see any nits or other 
issues. Overall, the draft appears to be well written and well thought out.

Regards,

Chris