Last Call Review of draft-ietf-mpls-summary-frr-rsvpte-07
review-ietf-mpls-summary-frr-rsvpte-07-secdir-lc-lonvick-2019-12-24-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-mpls-summary-frr-rsvpte
Requested rev. no specific revision (document currently at 08)
Type Last Call Review
Team Security Area Directorate (secdir)
Deadline 2019-12-25
Requested 2019-12-11
Authors Mike Taillon, Tarek Saad, Rakesh Gandhi, Abhishek Deshmukh, Markus Jork, Vishnu Beeram
Draft last updated 2019-12-24
Completed reviews Rtgdir Last Call review of -05 by Andrew Malis (diff)
Tsvart Last Call review of -07 by Gorry Fairhurst (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -07 by Chris Lonvick (diff)
Genart Last Call review of -07 by Theresa Enghardt (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Chris Lonvick
State Completed
Review review-ietf-mpls-summary-frr-rsvpte-07-secdir-lc-lonvick-2019-12-24
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/HnyuJNE34Xh4Rv2vf5btsV-o26E
Reviewed rev. 07 (document currently at 08)
Review result Ready
Review completed: 2019-12-16

Review
review-ietf-mpls-summary-frr-rsvpte-07-secdir-lc-lonvick-2019-12-24

Hi,

I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's 
ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. 
These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security 
area directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these 
comments just like any other last call comments.

The summary of the review is READY.

The Security Considerations section is a bit thin, but it appropriately 
addresses the issue that an implementation will increase the attack 
surface of an RSVP object. Since this is an extension to the protocol, 
the security considerations sections of the controlling RFCs are identified.

I skimmed the draft a few times but did not see any nits or other 
issues. Overall, the draft appears to be well written and well thought out.

Regards,

Chris