Early Review of draft-ietf-mpls-tp-mip-mep-map-08
review-ietf-mpls-tp-mip-mep-map-08-genart-early-carpenter-2013-08-06-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-mpls-tp-mip-mep-map
Requested rev. no specific revision (document currently at 09)
Type Early Review
Team General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart)
Deadline 2013-09-10
Requested 2013-08-02
Authors Adrian Farrel, Hideki Endo, Rolf Winter, Yoshinori Koike, Manuel Paul
Draft last updated 2013-08-06
Completed reviews Genart Early review of -08 by Brian Carpenter (diff)
Genart Telechat review of -09 by Brian Carpenter
Secdir Last Call review of -08 by Vincent Roca (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Brian Carpenter 
State Completed
Review review-ietf-mpls-tp-mip-mep-map-08-genart-early-carpenter-2013-08-06
Reviewed rev. 08 (document currently at 09)
Review result Ready
Review completed: 2013-08-06

Review
review-ietf-mpls-tp-mip-mep-map-08-genart-early-carpenter-2013-08-06

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
<

http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
you may receive.

Document: draft-ietf-mpls-tp-mip-mep-map-08.txt (Informational)
Reviewer: Brian Carpenter
Review Date: 2013-08-06
IETF LC End Date: 2013-08-21
IESG Telechat date:

Summary:  Ready
--------

Minor Issue:
------------

I don't see the value in citing RFC 2119. I only spotted two MUSTs, which would
be perfectly fine in lower case. The second of them is in a sentence whose
syntax needs fixing:

"It MUST be assured that all traffic for which the MEP/MIP is associated with
must pass through or be terminated at that point."

I think this means:

"All traffic associated with the MEP/MIP must pass through or be terminated
at that point."