Early Review of draft-ietf-mpls-tp-mip-mep-map-08
review-ietf-mpls-tp-mip-mep-map-08-genart-early-carpenter-2013-08-06-00
Request | Review of | draft-ietf-mpls-tp-mip-mep-map |
---|---|---|
Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 09) | |
Type | Early Review | |
Team | General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart) | |
Deadline | 2013-09-10 | |
Requested | 2013-08-02 | |
Authors | Adrian Farrel , Hideki Endo , Rolf Winter , Yoshinori Koike , Manuel Paul | |
I-D last updated | 2013-08-06 | |
Completed reviews |
Genart Early review of -08
by Brian E. Carpenter
(diff)
Genart Telechat review of -09 by Brian E. Carpenter Secdir Last Call review of -08 by Vincent Roca (diff) |
|
Assignment | Reviewer | Brian E. Carpenter |
State | Completed | |
Request | Early review on draft-ietf-mpls-tp-mip-mep-map by General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) Assigned | |
Reviewed revision | 08 (document currently at 09) | |
Result | Ready | |
Completed | 2013-08-06 |
review-ietf-mpls-tp-mip-mep-map-08-genart-early-carpenter-2013-08-06-00
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at < http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document: draft-ietf-mpls-tp-mip-mep-map-08.txt (Informational) Reviewer: Brian Carpenter Review Date: 2013-08-06 IETF LC End Date: 2013-08-21 IESG Telechat date: Summary: Ready -------- Minor Issue: ------------ I don't see the value in citing RFC 2119. I only spotted two MUSTs, which would be perfectly fine in lower case. The second of them is in a sentence whose syntax needs fixing: "It MUST be assured that all traffic for which the MEP/MIP is associated with must pass through or be terminated at that point." I think this means: "All traffic associated with the MEP/MIP must pass through or be terminated at that point."