Last Call Review of draft-ietf-mpls-tp-shared-ring-protection-05
review-ietf-mpls-tp-shared-ring-protection-05-secdir-lc-hoffman-2017-05-11-00
| Request | Review of | draft-ietf-mpls-tp-shared-ring-protection |
|---|---|---|
| Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 06) | |
| Type | Last Call Review | |
| Team | Security Area Directorate (secdir) | |
| Deadline | 2017-05-12 | |
| Requested | 2017-04-28 | |
| Authors | Weiqiang Cheng , Lei Wang , Han Li , Huub van Helvoort , Jie Dong | |
| I-D last updated | 2017-05-11 | |
| Completed reviews |
Rtgdir Last Call review of -04
by Mach Chen
(diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -05 by Paul E. Hoffman (diff) Genart Last Call review of -05 by Christer Holmberg (diff) |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Paul E. Hoffman |
| State | Completed | |
| Request | Last Call review on draft-ietf-mpls-tp-shared-ring-protection by Security Area Directorate Assigned | |
| Reviewed revision | 05 (document currently at 06) | |
| Result | Ready | |
| Completed | 2017-05-11 |
review-ietf-mpls-tp-shared-ring-protection-05-secdir-lc-hoffman-2017-05-11-00
This document describes MPLS-TP Shared Ring Protection (MSRP), an
extension to MPLS-TP. It doesn't need any more or less security than
MPLS-TE itself. The Security Considerations say:
The RPS protocol defined in this document is carried in the G-ACh
[RFC5586], which is a generalization of the Associated Channel
defined in [RFC4385]. The security considerations specified in
these
documents apply to the proposed RPS mechanism.
That seems sufficient for this document.
--Paul Hoffman