Last Call Review of draft-ietf-mpls-tp-temporal-hitless-psm-12
review-ietf-mpls-tp-temporal-hitless-psm-12-opsdir-lc-mitchell-2017-03-07-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-mpls-tp-temporal-hitless-psm
Requested rev. no specific revision (document currently at 14)
Type Last Call Review
Team Ops Directorate (opsdir)
Deadline 2017-03-03
Requested 2017-02-17
Draft last updated 2017-03-07
Completed reviews Rtgdir Early review of -09 by Dave Sinicrope (diff)
Opsdir Last Call review of -12 by Jon Mitchell (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -12 by Tero Kivinen (diff)
Genart Last Call review of -12 by Stewart Bryant (diff)
Genart Telechat review of -13 by Stewart Bryant (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Jon Mitchell
State Completed
Review review-ietf-mpls-tp-temporal-hitless-psm-12-opsdir-lc-mitchell-2017-03-07
Reviewed rev. 12 (document currently at 14)
Review result Has Nits
Review completed: 2017-03-07

Review
review-ietf-mpls-tp-temporal-hitless-psm-12-opsdir-lc-mitchell-2017-03-07

I have reviewed this document as part of the Operational directorate's 
ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG.  These 
comments were written with the intent of improving the operational aspects of the 
IETF drafts. Comments that are not addressed in last call may be included in AD reviews 
during the IESG review.  Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments 
just like any other last call comments. 

Document is Ready with Nits.  I share the concern that it's not totally clear upfront this is
a requirements versus solution document.  There is also not much in the way of requirements
of notification or how to signal back to the operator that a fault has occurred, but this
may be OK if whatever solution would meet the requirements of this draft will include
such text or rely on existing mechanisms discussed in RFC6371.