Last Call Review of draft-ietf-mtgvenue-meeting-policy-04
review-ietf-mtgvenue-meeting-policy-04-genart-lc-even-2018-04-15-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-mtgvenue-meeting-policy
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 07)
Type Last Call Review
Team General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart)
Deadline 2018-04-19
Requested 2018-04-05
Authors Suresh Krishnan
I-D last updated 2018-04-15
Completed reviews Rtgdir Telechat review of -04 by Julien Meuric (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -04 by Chris M. Lonvick (diff)
Genart Last Call review of -04 by Roni Even (diff)
Genart Telechat review of -06 by Roni Even (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Roni Even
State Completed
Request Last Call review on draft-ietf-mtgvenue-meeting-policy by General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) Assigned
Reviewed revision 04 (document currently at 07)
Result Ready w/nits
Completed 2018-04-15
review-ietf-mtgvenue-meeting-policy-04-genart-lc-even-2018-04-15-00
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.

For more information, please see the FAQ at

<https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Document: draft-ietf-mtgvenue-meeting-policy-??
Reviewer: Roni Even
Review Date: 2018-04-15
IETF LC End Date: 2018-04-19
IESG Telechat date: 2018-05-10

Summary:
The document is ready for publication as BCP with nits

Major issues:

Minor issues:

Nits/editorial comments:
1. I was wondering what is the process for selecting exploratory meeting site
comparing to sites according to the regular 1-1-1 policy (who make the
proposal, where is it discussed).  The
draft-ietf-mtgvenue-iaoc-venue-selection-process does not mention the
exploratory meeting site.

2. In section 2 "BACKGROUND NOTE:The" missing space.