Last Call Review of draft-ietf-nea-pt-eap-06
review-ietf-nea-pt-eap-06-secdir-lc-johansson-2013-01-10-00
Request | Review of | draft-ietf-nea-pt-eap |
---|---|---|
Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 09) | |
Type | Last Call Review | |
Team | Security Area Directorate (secdir) | |
Deadline | 2013-01-16 | |
Requested | 2013-01-03 | |
Authors | Nancy Cam-Winget , Paul Sangster | |
I-D last updated | 2013-01-10 | |
Completed reviews |
Genart Last Call review of -06
by Kathleen Moriarty
(diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -06 by Leif Johansson (diff) |
|
Assignment | Reviewer | Leif Johansson |
State | Completed | |
Request | Last Call review on draft-ietf-nea-pt-eap by Security Area Directorate Assigned | |
Reviewed revision | 06 (document currently at 09) | |
Result | Has nits | |
Completed | 2013-01-10 |
review-ietf-nea-pt-eap-06-secdir-lc-johansson-2013-01-10-00
I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments. This document describes a posture transport protocol for EAP tunnel methods. I found the document clearly written and easy to follow. The only suggestion I have is that in section 3.4 (or 4.2.5) on the Asokan Attack the document should clearly state that the verification of the channel token MUST be performed before any other attestations are evaluated. Cheers Leif