Last Call Review of draft-ietf-nea-pt-eap-06
review-ietf-nea-pt-eap-06-secdir-lc-johansson-2013-01-10-00
| Request | Review of | draft-ietf-nea-pt-eap |
|---|---|---|
| Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 09) | |
| Type | IETF Last Call Review | |
| Team | Security Area Directorate (secdir) | |
| Deadline | 2013-01-16 | |
| Requested | 2013-01-03 | |
| Authors | Nancy Cam-Winget , Paul Sangster | |
| I-D last updated | 2015-10-14 (Latest revision 2013-03-28) | |
| Completed reviews |
Genart IETF Last Call review of -06
by Kathleen Moriarty
(diff)
Secdir IETF Last Call review of -06 by Leif Johansson (diff) |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Leif Johansson |
| State | Completed | |
| Request | IETF Last Call review on draft-ietf-nea-pt-eap by Security Area Directorate Assigned | |
| Reviewed revision | 06 (document currently at 09) | |
| Result | Has nits | |
| Completed | 2013-01-10 |
review-ietf-nea-pt-eap-06-secdir-lc-johansson-2013-01-10-00
I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's
ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG.
These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security
area directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these
comments just like any other last call comments.
This document describes a posture transport protocol for EAP tunnel
methods.
I found the document clearly written and easy to follow.
The only suggestion I have is that in section 3.4 (or 4.2.5) on the Asokan
Attack the document should clearly state that the verification of the
channel
token MUST be performed before any other attestations are evaluated.
Cheers Leif