Last Call Review of draft-ietf-netconf-restconf-notif-13
review-ietf-netconf-restconf-notif-13-secdir-lc-malhotra-2019-04-11-00
| Request | Review of | draft-ietf-netconf-restconf-notif |
|---|---|---|
| Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 15) | |
| Type | Last Call Review | |
| Team | Security Area Directorate (secdir) | |
| Deadline | 2019-04-12 | |
| Requested | 2019-03-22 | |
| Authors | Eric Voit , Reshad Rahman , Einar Nilsen-Nygaard , Alexander Clemm , Andy Bierman | |
| I-D last updated | 2019-04-11 | |
| Completed reviews |
Yangdoctors Last Call review of -12
by Robert Wilton
(diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -13 by Aanchal Malhotra (diff) Tsvart Last Call review of -13 by Wesley Eddy (diff) Genart Last Call review of -13 by Robert Sparks (diff) Opsdir Last Call review of -13 by Dan Romascanu (diff) |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Aanchal Malhotra |
| State | Completed | |
| Request | Last Call review on draft-ietf-netconf-restconf-notif by Security Area Directorate Assigned | |
| Reviewed revision | 13 (document currently at 15) | |
| Result | Ready | |
| Completed | 2019-04-11 |
review-ietf-netconf-restconf-notif-13-secdir-lc-malhotra-2019-04-11-00
The document is very clear and concise. I just have one minor clarification question. Section 3.4 Page 9 that says the following: "In addition to any required ........SHOULD only be allowed......". Is there a reason for using SHOULD instead of MUST?