Skip to main content

Last Call Review of draft-ietf-netconf-subscribed-notifications-23
review-ietf-netconf-subscribed-notifications-23-opsdir-lc-pignataro-2019-04-05-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-netconf-subscribed-notifications
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 26)
Type Last Call Review
Team Ops Directorate (opsdir)
Deadline 2019-04-12
Requested 2019-03-22
Authors Eric Voit , Alexander Clemm , Alberto Gonzalez Prieto , Einar Nilsen-Nygaard , Ambika Tripathy
I-D last updated 2019-04-05
Completed reviews Yangdoctors Last Call review of -10 by Andy Bierman (diff)
Yangdoctors Last Call review of -21 by Andy Bierman (diff)
Rtgdir Last Call review of -23 by Ravi Singh (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -23 by Chris M. Lonvick (diff)
Tsvart Last Call review of -23 by Wesley Eddy (diff)
Opsdir Last Call review of -23 by Carlos Pignataro (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Carlos Pignataro
State Completed
Request Last Call review on draft-ietf-netconf-subscribed-notifications by Ops Directorate Assigned
Reviewed revision 23 (document currently at 26)
Result Has nits
Completed 2019-04-05
review-ietf-netconf-subscribed-notifications-23-opsdir-lc-pignataro-2019-04-05-00
Hi,

I have reviewed this document as part of the Operational directorate's
ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG.  These
comments were written with the intent of improving the operational aspects of
the IETF drafts. Comments that are not addressed in last call may be included
in AD reviews during the IESG review.  Document editors and WG chairs should
treat these comments just like any other last call comments.

Summary: Almost Ready

This is a comprehensive very well written document.

From an operational point of view, as per the ops-dir review, I have no
concerns or comments. Might be nice to collect some of the operational points
in an Operations Consideration section, particularly given the document
structure of Section 5.x, "ZZZ Considerations".

I do have one important question for consideration, which is: what is *really*
the relationship of this (+ draft-ietf-netconf-netconf-event-notifications
potentially) with RFC 5277? A Normative reference, this doc has no metadata
regarding Updating, Obsoleting, etc. Yet lots of it is indeed a superset of it.

I recommend the authors+ADs consider whether there is any more formal
relationship with RFC 5277 that would require meta-tagging the RFC.

Thanks,

Carlos Pignataro.