Last Call Review of draft-ietf-netconf-tls-client-server-25
review-ietf-netconf-tls-client-server-25-secdir-lc-ladd-2021-07-21-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-netconf-tls-client-server-24
Requested revision 24 (document currently at 41)
Type Last Call Review
Team Security Area Directorate (secdir)
Deadline 2021-06-22
Requested 2021-06-08
Requested by Mahesh Jethanandani
Authors Kent Watsen
I-D last updated 2021-07-21
Completed reviews Yangdoctors Last Call review of -03 by Andy Bierman (diff)
Yangdoctors Last Call review of -24 by Andy Bierman (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -25 by Watson Ladd (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Watson Ladd
State Partially completed
Request Last Call review on draft-ietf-netconf-tls-client-server by Security Area Directorate Assigned
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/yYZwGNGDWZ947s6dkLSf_SKH4NI
Reviewed revision 25 (document currently at 41)
Result Ready
Completed 2021-07-21
review-ietf-netconf-tls-client-server-25-secdir-lc-ladd-2021-07-21-00
Dear readers,
Forgive my completing this review almost a month late.

I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's
ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the
IESG.  These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the
security area directors.  Document editors and WG chairs should treat
these comments just like any other last call comments.

The summary of the review is ready, because I can't find anything wrong with
it. Your comfort with this fact should be minimal.

Benjamin Kaduk writes me to inform you that the issues with the PSK in TLS 1.3
are being worked on.

And now on to my evaluation of the document. The problem is that I can't
evaluate this in any substantive way: it is a whole bunch of YANG, a technology
I am completely ignorant of. The few English sentences I saw looked fine, and I
didn't spot anything wrong, but I likely wouldn't have.

Sincerely,
Watson Ladd