Early Review of draft-ietf-netconf-udp-client-server-06
review-ietf-netconf-udp-client-server-06-tsvart-early-ott-2025-05-09-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-netconf-udp-client-server
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 10)
Type Early Review
Team Transport Area Review Team (tsvart)
Deadline 2025-05-09
Requested 2025-04-18
Requested by Kent Watsen
Authors Alex Huang Feng , Pierre Francois , Kent Watsen
I-D last updated 2026-06-15 (Latest revision 2025-12-16)
Completed reviews Yangdoctors Early review of -06 by Jürgen Schönwälder (diff)
Opsdir Early review of -07 by Ran Chen (diff)
Tsvart Early review of -06 by Joerg Ott (diff)
Genart IETF Last Call review of -09 by Elwyn B. Davies (diff)
Dnsdir IETF Last Call review of -09 by Peter van Dijk (diff)
Comments 
The Shepherd write-up says:

  - Remarks on "UDP multicast clients" could be cleared by a 
    "Transport Area Review Team review"

The YANG Doctor review says:

  - The definitions may not be sufficient for UDP multicast clients and 
    servers. I am not sure whether anything needs to be said about this.
Assignment Reviewer Joerg Ott
State Completed
Request Early review on draft-ietf-netconf-udp-client-server by Transport Area Review Team Assigned
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsv-art/QlBDAO8cXwdRzontbFAcHWNF6uI
Reviewed revision 06 (document currently at 10)
Result Ready
Completed 2025-05-09
review-ietf-netconf-udp-client-server-06-tsvart-early-ott-2025-05-09-00
The document describes the YANG model for UDP clients and servers.  It does not
appear to raise any transport issues.

Nit: In two places, the document speaks of "UDP messages".  "UDP datagrams", as
also used elsewhere in the document, would be correct.