Early Review of draft-ietf-netconf-yang-library-03
review-ietf-netconf-yang-library-03-secdir-early-yu-2016-02-04-00
| Request | Review of | draft-ietf-netconf-yang-library |
|---|---|---|
| Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 06) | |
| Type | Early Review | |
| Team | Security Area Directorate (secdir) | |
| Deadline | 2016-05-03 | |
| Requested | 2015-12-22 | |
| Authors | Andy Bierman , Martin Björklund , Kent Watsen | |
| I-D last updated | 2016-02-04 | |
| Completed reviews |
Genart Last Call review of -05
by Vijay K. Gurbani
(diff)
Secdir Early review of -03 by Taylor Yu (diff) Secdir Last Call review of -05 by Taylor Yu (diff) Opsdir Last Call review of -05 by Jouni Korhonen (diff) |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Taylor Yu |
| State | Completed | |
| Review |
review-ietf-netconf-yang-library-03-secdir-early-yu-2016-02-04
|
|
| Reviewed revision | 03 (document currently at 06) | |
| Result | Ready | |
| Completed | 2016-02-04 |
review-ietf-netconf-yang-library-03-secdir-early-yu-2016-02-04-00
I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments. The Security Considerations of this document seem reasonable. It might be useful to add a comparison of the risks posed by sensitive information exposed by this YANG module with information exposed by other aspects of NETCONF, or available through methods such as fingerprinting. Admittedly, a meaningful comparison might be highly context-specific, so a general comparison might have limited utility.