Skip to main content

Telechat Review of draft-ietf-netmod-revised-datastores-09
review-ietf-netmod-revised-datastores-09-secdir-telechat-eastlake-2018-01-11-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-netmod-revised-datastores
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 10)
Type Telechat Review
Team Security Area Directorate (secdir)
Deadline 2018-01-09
Requested 2017-12-21
Authors Martin Björklund , Jürgen Schönwälder , Philip A. Shafer , Kent Watsen , Robert Wilton
Draft last updated 2018-01-11
Completed reviews Yangdoctors Early review of -09 by Jan Lindblad (diff)
Secdir Telechat review of -09 by Donald E. Eastlake 3rd (diff)
Opsdir Telechat review of -09 by Victor Kuarsingh (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Donald E. Eastlake 3rd
State Completed
Review review-ietf-netmod-revised-datastores-09-secdir-telechat-eastlake-2018-01-11
Reviewed revision 09 (document currently at 10)
Result Ready
Completed 2018-01-11
review-ietf-netmod-revised-datastores-09-secdir-telechat-eastlake-2018-01-11-00
I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's
ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the
IESG.  Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.

The summary of the review is Ready.

This draft specifies an elaborated datastore model for YANG based on
experience with the original model in RFC 6241. It is probably
correct, as stated in the Security Considerations, that this model
itself has no security effect.

The Security Considerations refer to the "YANG security module
security guidelines" by that quoted string only. I would assume these
guidelines are in a document somewhere and it would be nice to give a
pointer to that document.

Section 5.1, Page 11, third line up from the 5.1.1 heading, should the
reference to "Section 5" be a reference to "Figure 2"?

Thanks,
Donald
===============================
 Donald E. Eastlake 3rd   +1-508-333-2270 (cell)
 155 Beaver Street, Milford, MA 01757 USA
 d3e3e3@gmail.com