Last Call Review of draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6991-bis-16
review-ietf-netmod-rfc6991-bis-16-secdir-lc-shekh-yusef-2024-09-07-00
| Request | Review of | draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6991-bis-16 |
|---|---|---|
| Requested revision | 16 (document currently at 17) | |
| Type | Last Call Review | |
| Team | Security Area Directorate (secdir) | |
| Deadline | 2024-09-13 | |
| Requested | 2024-08-27 | |
| Requested by | Mahesh Jethanandani | |
| Authors | Jürgen Schönwälder | |
| I-D last updated | 2024-09-07 | |
| Completed reviews |
Yangdoctors Last Call review of -16
by Martin Björklund
(diff)
Opsdir Last Call review of -16 by Giuseppe Fioccola (diff) Secdir Last Call review of -16 by Rifaat Shekh-Yusef (diff) Dnsdir Last Call review of -16 by Florian Obser (diff) Genart Last Call review of -16 by Russ Housley (diff) Artart Last Call review of -16 by Bron Gondwana (diff) Dnsdir Telechat review of -17 by Florian Obser |
|
| Comments |
While the request for YANG Doctors is obvious, the other directorate reviews are more to make sure there is nothing that the WG might have overlooked. In particular, there was quite a bit of discussion around date/time and zone offset, that could use another pair of eyes. |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Rifaat Shekh-Yusef |
| State | Completed | |
| Request | Last Call review on draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6991-bis by Security Area Directorate Assigned | |
| Posted at | https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/9wIdHrtMFs9fikZ98G0dmhcsz90 | |
| Reviewed revision | 16 (document currently at 17) | |
| Result | Ready | |
| Completed | 2024-09-07 |
review-ietf-netmod-rfc6991-bis-16-secdir-lc-shekh-yusef-2024-09-07-00
The security section seems reasonable to me, as the document only defines new data types that could be used with YANG data models. The security implication is from the usage of these data types, which is covered by other existing RFCs.