Last Call Review of draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6991-bis-16
review-ietf-netmod-rfc6991-bis-16-secdir-lc-shekh-yusef-2024-09-07-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6991-bis-16
Requested revision 16 (document currently at 18)
Type IETF Last Call Review
Team Security Area Directorate (secdir)
Deadline 2024-09-13
Requested 2024-08-27
Requested by Mahesh Jethanandani
Authors Jürgen Schönwälder
I-D last updated 2025-12-22 (Latest revision 2025-06-23)
Completed reviews Yangdoctors IETF Last Call review of -16 by Martin Björklund (diff)
Opsdir IETF Last Call review of -16 by Giuseppe Fioccola (diff)
Secdir IETF Last Call review of -16 by Rifaat Shekh-Yusef (diff)
Dnsdir IETF Last Call review of -16 by Florian Obser (diff)
Genart IETF Last Call review of -16 by Russ Housley (diff)
Artart IETF Last Call review of -16 by Bron Gondwana (diff)
Dnsdir Telechat review of -17 by Florian Obser (diff)
Artart Telechat review of -17 by Bron Gondwana (diff)
Intdir Telechat review of -17 by Antoine Fressancourt (diff)
Comments 
While the request for YANG Doctors is obvious, the other directorate reviews are more to make sure there is nothing that the WG might have overlooked. In particular, there was quite a bit of discussion around date/time and zone offset, that could use another pair of eyes.
Assignment Reviewer Rifaat Shekh-Yusef
State Completed
Request IETF Last Call review on draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6991-bis by Security Area Directorate Assigned
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/9wIdHrtMFs9fikZ98G0dmhcsz90
Reviewed revision 16 (document currently at 18)
Result Ready
Completed 2024-09-07
review-ietf-netmod-rfc6991-bis-16-secdir-lc-shekh-yusef-2024-09-07-00
The security section seems reasonable to me, as the document only defines new
data types that could be used with YANG data models. The security implication
is from the usage of these data types, which is covered by other existing RFCs.