Telechat Review of draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6991-bis-17
review-ietf-netmod-rfc6991-bis-17-dnsdir-telechat-obser-2024-11-27-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6991-bis
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 18)
Type Telechat Review
Team DNS Directorate (dnsdir)
Deadline 2024-12-17
Requested 2024-11-26
Authors Jürgen Schönwälder
I-D last updated 2025-12-22 (Latest revision 2025-06-23)
Completed reviews Yangdoctors IETF Last Call review of -16 by Martin Björklund (diff)
Opsdir IETF Last Call review of -16 by Giuseppe Fioccola (diff)
Secdir IETF Last Call review of -16 by Rifaat Shekh-Yusef (diff)
Dnsdir IETF Last Call review of -16 by Florian Obser (diff)
Genart IETF Last Call review of -16 by Russ Housley (diff)
Artart IETF Last Call review of -16 by Bron Gondwana (diff)
Dnsdir Telechat review of -17 by Florian Obser (diff)
Artart Telechat review of -17 by Bron Gondwana (diff)
Intdir Telechat review of -17 by Antoine Fressancourt (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Florian Obser
State Completed
Request Telechat review on draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6991-bis by DNS Directorate Assigned
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsdir/AxSLPrcNe1N5QDCrHnhnkolJctk
Reviewed revision 17 (document currently at 18)
Result Ready w/issues
Completed 2024-11-27
review-ietf-netmod-rfc6991-bis-17-dnsdir-telechat-obser-2024-11-27-00
I have been selected as the DNS Directorate reviewer for this draft. The
DNS Directorate seeks to review all DNS or DNS-related drafts as
they pass through IETF last call and IESG review, and sometimes on special
request. The purpose of the review is to provide assistance to the ADs.
For more information about the DNS Directorate, please see
https://wiki.ietf.org/en/group/dnsdir

I did a review of -16 and marked it ready.
An informative reference to RFC 9499 - DNS Terminology was added, thanks!

An issue was interoduced in -17:
The pattern for email-address was changed to '.+@.+'.
This was probably done in response to the ARTART review.
I'm not an expert in email addressing, but this seems way too lenient.

I'm marking this as "Ready with issues", noting that I have no idea how to address the issue.