Telechat Review of draft-ietf-netmod-rfc7223bis-01
review-ietf-netmod-rfc7223bis-01-opsdir-telechat-korhonen-2018-01-08-00
| Request | Review of | draft-ietf-netmod-rfc7223bis |
|---|---|---|
| Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 03) | |
| Type | Telechat Review | |
| Team | Ops Directorate (opsdir) | |
| Deadline | 2018-01-09 | |
| Requested | 2017-12-19 | |
| Authors | Martin Björklund | |
| I-D last updated | 2018-01-08 | |
| Completed reviews |
Yangdoctors Early review of -01
by Andy Bierman
(diff)
Opsdir Telechat review of -01 by Jouni Korhonen (diff) Rtgdir Telechat review of -03 by Susan Hares |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Jouni Korhonen |
| State | Completed | |
| Request | Telechat review on draft-ietf-netmod-rfc7223bis by Ops Directorate Assigned | |
| Reviewed revision | 01 (document currently at 03) | |
| Result | Ready | |
| Completed | 2018-01-08 |
review-ietf-netmod-rfc7223bis-01-opsdir-telechat-korhonen-2018-01-08-00
I did a shallow review on the document and to me it looked ok. The YANG passes online validators (obviously the examples in Appendixes create bogus warnings). Similarly IDnits warning concerning abstract and "obsoletes" is bogus.