IETF Last Call Review of draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8407bis-24
review-ietf-netmod-rfc8407bis-24-dnsdir-lc-weber-2025-05-02-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8407bis
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 28)
Type IETF Last Call Review
Team DNS Directorate (dnsdir)
Deadline 2025-05-05
Requested 2025-04-21
Authors Andy Bierman , Mohamed Boucadair , Qin Wu
I-D last updated 2025-06-05 (Latest revision 2025-06-05)
Completed reviews Yangdoctors IETF Last Call review of -11 by Xufeng Liu (diff)
Yangdoctors Early review of -24 by Xufeng Liu (diff)
Opsdir Early review of -24 by Giuseppe Fioccola (diff)
Dnsdir IETF Last Call review of -24 by Ralf Weber (diff)
Genart IETF Last Call review of -24 by Christer Holmberg (diff)
Tsvart IETF Last Call review of -25 by Dr. Joseph D. Touch (diff)
Dnsdir Telechat review of -25 by Ralf Weber (diff)
Secdir Telechat review of -25 by Yoav Nir (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Ralf Weber
State Completed
Request IETF Last Call review on draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8407bis by DNS Directorate Assigned
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsdir/clkcBCyY98jvEKY577oYbaXdiKs
Reviewed revision 24 (document currently at 28)
Result Ready
Completed 2025-05-02
review-ietf-netmod-rfc8407bis-24-dnsdir-lc-weber-2025-05-02-00
Moin!

I am an assigned DNS Directorate reviewer for draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8407bis.

For more information about the DNS Directorate, please see
https://wiki.ietf.org/en/group/dnsdir

From a DNS perspective this draft is ready and all the references with regards
to DNS are ok.

I thought a bit about the RFC2606 reference as its updated by RFC6761, but as
the usage in the draft is purely on how to document DNS names and not the
application interaction RFC6761 adds, RFC2606 is the correct choice. Also any
mention of RFC6761 leads to long discussions in DNS circles ;-).

So long
-Ralf