Early Review of draft-ietf-netmod-sub-intf-vlan-model-17
review-ietf-netmod-sub-intf-vlan-model-17-opsdir-early-dunbar-2025-10-22-00
| Request | Review of | draft-ietf-netmod-sub-intf-vlan-model |
|---|---|---|
| Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 17) | |
| Type | Early Review | |
| Team | Ops Directorate (opsdir) | |
| Deadline | 2025-10-24 | |
| Requested | 2025-10-08 | |
| Requested by | Mahesh Jethanandani | |
| Authors | Robert Wilton , Scott Mansfield | |
| I-D last updated | 2025-10-29 (Latest revision 2025-10-08) | |
| Completed reviews |
Yangdoctors Early review of -14
by Per Andersson
(diff)
Opsdir Early review of -17 by Linda Dunbar Genart IETF Last Call review of -17 by Susan Hares Secdir Early review of -17 by Dave Thaler Intdir Early review of -17 by Darren Dukes |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Linda Dunbar |
| State | Completed | |
| Request | Early review on draft-ietf-netmod-sub-intf-vlan-model by Ops Directorate Assigned | |
| Posted at | https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ops-dir/nzzJfGYzFDPqW-vUu0rtmHI7h7A | |
| Reviewed revision | 17 | |
| Result | Has nits | |
| Completed | 2025-10-22 |
review-ietf-netmod-sub-intf-vlan-model-17-opsdir-early-dunbar-2025-10-22-00
Summary: The draft defines YANG models for VLAN and flexible encapsulation on sub-interfaces. It is technically solid and aligns well with existing interface and VLAN models. Questions: - Given that most commercial routers already implement mature sub-interface VLAN configurations, and are unlikely to change their operational behavior, could the authors clarify whether the intent of this model is purely to provide a standardized YANG abstraction for management systems rather than to influence device-level configuration semantics? - How is this model intended to coexist with the bridge-based VLAN model (IEEE 802.1Q / RFC 8919)? Can both be used on the same device or interface? Minor comments: - Need to clarify operational behavior when devices support both bridge-based VLAN configuration (per IEEE 802.1Q / RFC 8919) and sub-interface–based VLAN configuration (as defined in this draft), particularly if the same physical port could be referenced by both models. Best Regards, Linda Dunbar