Skip to main content

IETF Last Call Review of draft-ietf-netmod-yang-module-filename-06
review-ietf-netmod-yang-module-filename-06-genart-lc-halpern-2026-02-18-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-netmod-yang-module-filename
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 06)
Type IETF Last Call Review
Team General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart)
Deadline 2026-03-03
Requested 2026-02-17
Authors Per Andersson
I-D last updated 2026-03-04 (Latest revision 2026-02-18)
Completed reviews Yangdoctors Early review of -00 by Jürgen Schönwälder (diff)
Genart IETF Last Call review of -06 by Joel M. Halpern
Secdir IETF Last Call review of -06 by Barry Leiba
Opsdir IETF Last Call review of -06 by Aihua Guo
Assignment Reviewer Joel M. Halpern
State Completed
Request IETF Last Call review on draft-ietf-netmod-yang-module-filename by General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) Assigned
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/H4TnBB7YVKpZQDfdEx-xPna0gbs
Reviewed revision 06
Result Ready w/nits
Completed 2026-02-18
review-ietf-netmod-yang-module-filename-06-genart-lc-halpern-2026-02-18-00
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.

For more information, please see the FAQ at

<https://wiki.ietf.org/en/group/gen/GenArtFAQ>.

Document: draft-ietf-netmod-yang-module-filename-06
Reviewer: Joel Halpern
Review Date: 2026-02-18
IETF LC End Date: 2026-03-03
IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat

Summary: This document is ready for publication as a Proposed Standard.

Major issues: N/A

Minor issues: N/A

Nits/editorial comments:
    In section 2, the text says that if one chooses to use the semver in the
    file name, one uses it instead of the revision date.  However, the syntax
    diagram seems to say that both are permitted, with the revision date coming
    first. I wonder if there should be a comment about the risk of long semver
    names causing file names to exceed some system limits?