IETF Last Call Review of draft-ietf-netmod-yang-module-filename-06
review-ietf-netmod-yang-module-filename-06-genart-lc-halpern-2026-02-18-00
| Request | Review of | draft-ietf-netmod-yang-module-filename |
|---|---|---|
| Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 06) | |
| Type | IETF Last Call Review | |
| Team | General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart) | |
| Deadline | 2026-03-03 | |
| Requested | 2026-02-17 | |
| Authors | Per Andersson | |
| I-D last updated | 2026-03-04 (Latest revision 2026-02-18) | |
| Completed reviews |
Yangdoctors Early review of -00
by Jürgen Schönwälder
(diff)
Genart IETF Last Call review of -06 by Joel M. Halpern Secdir IETF Last Call review of -06 by Barry Leiba Opsdir IETF Last Call review of -06 by Aihua Guo |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Joel M. Halpern |
| State | Completed | |
| Request | IETF Last Call review on draft-ietf-netmod-yang-module-filename by General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) Assigned | |
| Posted at | https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/H4TnBB7YVKpZQDfdEx-xPna0gbs | |
| Reviewed revision | 06 | |
| Result | Ready w/nits | |
| Completed | 2026-02-18 |
review-ietf-netmod-yang-module-filename-06-genart-lc-halpern-2026-02-18-00
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For more information, please see the FAQ at <https://wiki.ietf.org/en/group/gen/GenArtFAQ>. Document: draft-ietf-netmod-yang-module-filename-06 Reviewer: Joel Halpern Review Date: 2026-02-18 IETF LC End Date: 2026-03-03 IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat Summary: This document is ready for publication as a Proposed Standard. Major issues: N/A Minor issues: N/A Nits/editorial comments: In section 2, the text says that if one chooses to use the semver in the file name, one uses it instead of the revision date. However, the syntax diagram seems to say that both are permitted, with the revision date coming first. I wonder if there should be a comment about the risk of long semver names causing file names to exceed some system limits?