Early Review of draft-ietf-netmod-yang-module-versioning-13
review-ietf-netmod-yang-module-versioning-13-yangdoctors-early-liu-2025-07-07-00
| Request | Review of | draft-ietf-netmod-yang-module-versioning-13 |
|---|---|---|
| Requested revision | 13 (document currently at 15) | |
| Type | Early Review | |
| Team | YANG Doctors (yangdoctors) | |
| Deadline | 2025-06-30 | |
| Requested | 2025-06-15 | |
| Requested by | Lou Berger | |
| Authors | Robert Wilton , Reshad Rahman , Balázs Lengyel , Joe Clarke , Jason Sterne | |
| I-D last updated | 2025-11-13 (Latest revision 2025-10-18) | |
| Completed reviews |
Yangdoctors IETF Last Call review of -05
by Radek Krejčí
(diff)
Yangdoctors Early review of -13 by Xufeng Liu (diff) Genart IETF Last Call review of -15 by Joel M. Halpern |
|
| Comments |
This document was previously reviewed. Given the level of attention this document as seen in the netmod WG I view asking for the new review as a bit of a formality as part of the submission process. |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Xufeng Liu |
| State | Completed | |
| Request | Early review on draft-ietf-netmod-yang-module-versioning by YANG Doctors Assigned | |
| Posted at | https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/yang-doctors/E7bqx1bE4tdf_yTk0KVuaCheqQA | |
| Reviewed revision | 13 (document currently at 15) | |
| Result | Ready | |
| Completed | 2025-07-07 |
review-ietf-netmod-yang-module-versioning-13-yangdoctors-early-liu-2025-07-07-00
This is a review of the YANG modules in draft-ietf-netmod-yang-module-versioning-13. This document contains two simple YANG modules: ietf-yang-revisions and ietf-yang-library-status, which are clearly defined. 1) Data examples The module ietf-yang-library-status has added only two leaves. Even though the augmentation is simple, I am still wondering if it would be beneficial to provide a data example in the Appedix 2) Both ietf-yang-revisions and ietf-yang-library-status are defined in Section 7 “Module Versioning Extension YANG Modules”. Should ietf-yang-library-status be put into a different section? Thanks, - Xufeng