Telechat Review of draft-ietf-netvc-testing-08
review-ietf-netvc-testing-08-opsdir-telechat-dunbar-2019-06-14-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-netvc-testing
Requested rev. no specific revision (document currently at 09)
Type Telechat Review
Team Ops Directorate (opsdir)
Deadline 2019-06-11
Requested 2019-06-05
Authors Thomas Daede, Andrey Norkin, Ilya Brailovskiy
Draft last updated 2019-06-14
Completed reviews Genart Last Call review of -08 by Francesca Palombini (diff)
Opsdir Telechat review of -08 by Linda Dunbar (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Linda Dunbar
State Completed
Review review-ietf-netvc-testing-08-opsdir-telechat-dunbar-2019-06-14
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ops-dir/V985mSy-4KUhmAplp1A64q4zf3o
Reviewed rev. 08 (document currently at 09)
Review result Has Nits
Review completed: 2019-06-14

Review
review-ietf-netvc-testing-08-opsdir-telechat-dunbar-2019-06-14

Reviewer: Linda Dunbar
Review result: Ready with Comments & Nits

I have reviewed this document as part of the Operational directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG.  These comments were written with the intent of improving the operational aspects of the IETF drafts. Comments that are not addressed in last call may be included in AD reviews during the IESG review.  Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments.

This document describes the guidelines and procedures for evaluating images & videos.  Even though I am not a video/codec expert, the document is written clear enough for me to follow through. 

Only one part not clear: There are many image names being listed in the Section 5.2.2 ~5.2.5. Are those image names significant?  I see some of those names are listed in the [TESTSEQUENCE] reference. But I don't understand why need to literally list those names. What the reason for listing them? those names occupied many pages, kind of diluting the other procedures being described. 

Best Regards, 
Linda Dunbar