Last Call Review of draft-ietf-nfsv4-flex-files-15
review-ietf-nfsv4-flex-files-15-opsdir-lc-dunbar-2018-01-04-00
| Request | Review of | draft-ietf-nfsv4-flex-files |
|---|---|---|
| Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 19) | |
| Type | Last Call Review | |
| Team | Ops Directorate (opsdir) | |
| Deadline | 2018-01-16 | |
| Requested | 2017-12-19 | |
| Authors | Benny Halevy , Thomas Haynes | |
| I-D last updated | 2018-01-04 | |
| Completed reviews |
Genart Last Call review of -15
by Christer Holmberg
(diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -15 by Brian Weis (diff) Opsdir Last Call review of -15 by Linda Dunbar (diff) |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Linda Dunbar |
| State | Completed | |
| Request | Last Call review on draft-ietf-nfsv4-flex-files by Ops Directorate Assigned | |
| Reviewed revision | 15 (document currently at 19) | |
| Result | Has nits | |
| Completed | 2018-01-04 |
review-ietf-nfsv4-flex-files-15-opsdir-lc-dunbar-2018-01-04-00
I think the document is written very clear. Ready to move forward, except some minor Nits. The document used "uids" and "gids" extensively. I assume that "uids" = "User IDs". How about "gids"? does it mean "Group IDs"? it will be helpful to expand it at the first occurance in the document. In Section 2.2.2 (Examples of using uids & gids) (Page 9), why saying "owner and group are modified.."? what does the value "1066" or "1067" represent (as the value "1697" represents the UID of the user "loghyr")? Linda Dunbar