Last Call Review of draft-ietf-nfsv4-layout-types-03
review-ietf-nfsv4-layout-types-03-genart-lc-shirazipour-2015-05-08-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-nfsv4-layout-types
Requested rev. no specific revision (document currently at 13)
Type Last Call Review
Team General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart)
Deadline 2015-05-12
Requested 2015-03-27
Other Reviews Genart Telechat review of -03 by Meral Shirazipour (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -03 by Joseph Salowey (diff)
Opsdir Last Call review of -03 by Menachem Dodge (diff)
Genart Last Call review of -09 by Meral Shirazipour (diff)
Review State Completed
Reviewer Meral Shirazipour
Review review-ietf-nfsv4-layout-types-03-genart-lc-shirazipour-2015-05-08
Posted at http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/gen-art/current/msg11580.html
Reviewed rev. 03 (document currently at 13)
Review result Ready with Nits
Draft last updated 2015-05-08
Review completed: 2015-05-08

Review
review-ietf-nfsv4-layout-types-03-genart-lc-shirazipour-2015-05-08

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at  

http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq

. 

Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive.

Document: draft-ietf-nfsv4-layout-types-03
Reviewer: Meral Shirazipour
Review Date: 2015-04-16
IETF LC End Date:  2015-04-16
IESG Telechat date: NA


Summary:
This draft is ready to be published as Standards Track RFC but it has some nits.



Major issues:

Minor issues:

Nits/editorial comments:

-[Page 1], Abstract, "those those specifically", remove extra "those"
-[Page 6], end of 3.2, "if at all possible,"--->"if at all possible."
-[Page 6], section 3.3, "separably"--->"separately"
- [Page 10], ref [FlexFiles] has a new version 05 now
- [Page 10], ref [Lustre]  is expired. Should be removed?

Best Regards,
Meral
---
Meral Shirazipour
Ericsson
Research
www.ericsson.com