Last Call Review of draft-ietf-nfsv4-layrec-01
review-ietf-nfsv4-layrec-01-artart-lc-peng-2024-08-22-00

I am the assigned ART-ART reviewer for this draft.

Summary:

I have some minor concerns about this document that I think should be resolved
before publication.

Comments:

Major Issues:
 "No major issues found."

Minor Issues:

1.1 Definitions
I found that the terms listed here are exactly the same as those defined in
RFC8435. So I wonder whether it would make sense to simply refer to RFC8435
instead of repeating them.

2. Layout State Recovery
"After the grace period:
If the client were to send any lrf_stateid in the LAYOUTRETURN with the
anonymous stateid of all zeros, then the metadata server would respond with an
error of NFS4ERR_NO_GRACE (see Section 15.1.9.3 of [RFC8881])."

I am not sure whether there is an mistake in this sentence: "to send any
lrf_stateid in the LAYOUTRETURN with the anonymous stateid of all zeros"?
Should "with" be "other than"?

4. IANA Considerations
"IANA should use the current document (RFC-TBD) as the reference for the new
entries."

What are the "new entries" mentioned in this sentence? Would it be clearer to
list them here?

Nits:

None