Telechat Review of draft-ietf-nfsv4-multi-domain-fs-reqs-09
review-ietf-nfsv4-multi-domain-fs-reqs-09-genart-telechat-carpenter-2016-08-26-00
| Request | Review of | draft-ietf-nfsv4-multi-domain-fs-reqs |
|---|---|---|
| Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 11) | |
| Type | Telechat Review | |
| Team | General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart) | |
| Deadline | 2016-08-30 | |
| Requested | 2016-08-23 | |
| Authors | Andy Adamson , Nicolás Williams | |
| Draft last updated | 2016-08-26 | |
| Completed reviews |
Genart Last Call review of -08
by
Brian E. Carpenter
(diff)
Genart Telechat review of -09 by Brian E. Carpenter (diff) Secdir Last Call review of -08 by Russ Housley (diff) Secdir Telechat review of -09 by Russ Housley (diff) |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Brian E. Carpenter |
| State | Completed | |
| Review |
review-ietf-nfsv4-multi-domain-fs-reqs-09-genart-telechat-carpenter-2016-08-26
|
|
| Reviewed revision | 09 (document currently at 11) | |
| Result | Ready with Issues | |
| Completed | 2016-08-26 |
review-ietf-nfsv4-multi-domain-fs-reqs-09-genart-telechat-carpenter-2016-08-26-00
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft. For more information, please see the FAQ at < http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Document: draft-ietf-nfsv4-multi-domain-fs-reqs-09.txt Reviewer: Brian Carpenter Review Date: 2016-08-26 IETF LC End Date: 2016-07-06 IESG Telechat date: 2016-09-01 Summary: Ready with issues -------- Comment: After my Last Call review I expected to see a new version, -------- but that hasn't happened yet. Minor issue: ------------ "This document provides guidance on the deployment of..." I understand that the AD suggested the standards track, but the document reads more like a BCP than a Proposed Standard to me. As I read through the document, it describes alternatives and differing scenarios. Nits: ----- ** Downref: Normative reference to an Informational RFC: RFC 1813 This reference was added in the -09 version. I believe it should be Informative instead of Normative. ** Obsolete normative reference: RFC 1831 (Obsoleted by RFC 5531) This needs to be fixed.