Telechat Review of draft-ietf-nfsv4-rfc3530bis-26
review-ietf-nfsv4-rfc3530bis-26-genart-telechat-davies-2013-09-11-00
| Request | Review of | draft-ietf-nfsv4-rfc3530bis |
|---|---|---|
| Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 35) | |
| Type | Telechat Review | |
| Team | General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart) | |
| Deadline | 2013-05-28 | |
| Requested | 2013-05-23 | |
| Authors | Thomas Haynes , David Noveck | |
| I-D last updated | 2020-01-21 (Latest revision 2014-12-04) | |
| Completed reviews |
Genart IETF Last Call review of -25
by Martin Thomson
(diff)
Genart Telechat review of -26 by Elwyn B. Davies (diff) Genart Telechat review of -26 by Elwyn B. Davies (diff) Genart Telechat review of -33 by Elwyn B. Davies (diff) Genart IETF Last Call review of -34 by Elwyn B. Davies (diff) Secdir IETF Last Call review of -25 by Yoav Nir (diff) |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Elwyn B. Davies |
| State | Completed | |
| Request | Telechat review on draft-ietf-nfsv4-rfc3530bis by General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) Assigned | |
| Reviewed revision | 26 (document currently at 35) | |
| Result | Ready | |
| Completed | 2013-09-11 |
review-ietf-nfsv4-rfc3530bis-26-genart-telechat-davies-2013-09-11-00
I see that my review has just crossed with a new version of the draft (-26). I have had a quick look and the vast majority of the review still applies. The main piece of update in -26 addresses a comment I made about the Kerberos algorithms being insecure, which has obviously come in from other sources. Regards, Elwyn Sent from my ASUS Pad