Telechat Review of draft-ietf-nfsv4-rfc3530bis-26
review-ietf-nfsv4-rfc3530bis-26-genart-telechat-davies-2013-09-11-00
Request | Review of | draft-ietf-nfsv4-rfc3530bis |
---|---|---|
Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 35) | |
Type | Telechat Review | |
Team | General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart) | |
Deadline | 2013-05-28 | |
Requested | 2013-05-23 | |
Authors | Thomas Haynes , David Noveck | |
I-D last updated | 2013-09-11 | |
Completed reviews |
Genart Last Call review of -25
by Martin Thomson
(diff)
Genart Telechat review of -26 by Elwyn B. Davies (diff) Genart Telechat review of -26 by Elwyn B. Davies (diff) Genart Telechat review of -33 by Elwyn B. Davies (diff) Genart Last Call review of -34 by Elwyn B. Davies (diff) Secdir Last Call review of -25 by Yoav Nir (diff) |
|
Assignment | Reviewer | Elwyn B. Davies |
State | Completed | |
Request | Telechat review on draft-ietf-nfsv4-rfc3530bis by General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) Assigned | |
Reviewed revision | 26 (document currently at 35) | |
Result | Ready | |
Completed | 2013-09-11 |
review-ietf-nfsv4-rfc3530bis-26-genart-telechat-davies-2013-09-11-00
I see that my review has just crossed with a new version of the draft (-26). I have had a quick look and the vast majority of the review still applies. The main piece of update in -26 addresses a comment I made about the Kerberos algorithms being insecure, which has obviously come in from other sources. Regards, Elwyn Sent from my ASUS Pad