Last Call Review of draft-ietf-nfsv4-rfc5666bis-09
review-ietf-nfsv4-rfc5666bis-09-opsdir-lc-dodge-2017-02-07-00
Request | Review of | draft-ietf-nfsv4-rfc5666bis |
---|---|---|
Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 11) | |
Type | Last Call Review | |
Team | Ops Directorate (opsdir) | |
Deadline | 2017-02-07 | |
Requested | 2017-01-24 | |
Authors | Chuck Lever , William Allen Simpson , Tom Talpey | |
I-D last updated | 2017-02-07 | |
Completed reviews |
Opsdir Last Call review of -09
by Menachem Dodge
(diff)
Genart Last Call review of -09 by Ralph Droms (diff) Secdir Last Call review of -10 by Vincent Roca (diff) Genart Telechat review of -10 by Ralph Droms (diff) |
|
Assignment | Reviewer | Menachem Dodge |
State | Completed | |
Request | Last Call review on draft-ietf-nfsv4-rfc5666bis by Ops Directorate Assigned | |
Reviewed revision | 09 (document currently at 11) | |
Result | Has nits | |
Completed | 2017-02-07 |
review-ietf-nfsv4-rfc5666bis-09-opsdir-lc-dodge-2017-02-07-00
Hello, I reviewed the document "Remote Direct Memory Access Transport for Remote Procedure Call, Version One" (draft-ietf-nfsv4-rfc5666bis-09.txt) as part of the Operational directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the operational area directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments. Intended status: Standards Track Current IESG state: In Last Call IANA State: IANA Not OK Summary: This document specifies a protocol for conveying Remote Procedure Call (RPC) messages on physical transports capable of Remote Direct Memory Access (RDMA). This document is intended to obsolete RFC 5666. The new specification aims to clarify text, remove support for unimplemented RPC-over-RDMA Version One protocol elements, and describe current practice. NITS ==== The automatic nit tool has found the following warning: == Outdated reference: A later version (-06) exists of draft-ietf-nfsv4-rpcrdma-bidirection-05 The document is well written. I have no further issues. Thank you kindly, Menachem Dodge