Skip to main content

Last Call Review of draft-ietf-nfsv4-rfc5666bis-09
review-ietf-nfsv4-rfc5666bis-09-opsdir-lc-dodge-2017-02-07-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-nfsv4-rfc5666bis
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 11)
Type Last Call Review
Team Ops Directorate (opsdir)
Deadline 2017-02-07
Requested 2017-01-24
Authors Chuck Lever , William Allen Simpson , Tom Talpey
I-D last updated 2017-02-07
Completed reviews Opsdir Last Call review of -09 by Menachem Dodge (diff)
Genart Last Call review of -09 by Ralph Droms (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -10 by Vincent Roca (diff)
Genart Telechat review of -10 by Ralph Droms (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Menachem Dodge
State Completed
Request Last Call review on draft-ietf-nfsv4-rfc5666bis by Ops Directorate Assigned
Reviewed revision 09 (document currently at 11)
Result Has nits
Completed 2017-02-07
review-ietf-nfsv4-rfc5666bis-09-opsdir-lc-dodge-2017-02-07-00
Hello,

I reviewed the document "Remote Direct Memory Access Transport for Remote
Procedure Call, Version One" (draft-ietf-nfsv4-rfc5666bis-09.txt) as part of
the Operational directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being
processed by the IESG. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of
the operational area directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat
these comments just like any other last call comments.

Intended status: Standards Track
Current IESG state: In Last Call
IANA State: IANA Not OK

Summary: This document specifies a protocol for conveying Remote Procedure Call
(RPC) messages on physical transports capable of Remote Direct Memory Access
(RDMA). This document is intended to obsolete RFC 5666.

The new specification aims to clarify text, remove support for unimplemented
RPC-over-RDMA Version One protocol elements, and describe current practice.

NITS
====
The automatic nit tool has found the following warning:

 == Outdated reference: A later version (-06) exists of
 draft-ietf-nfsv4-rpcrdma-bidirection-05

The document is well written.

I have no further issues.

Thank you kindly,

Menachem Dodge