Last Call Review of draft-ietf-ntp-packet-timestamps-07
review-ietf-ntp-packet-timestamps-07-secdir-lc-xia-2020-02-20-00
Request | Review of | draft-ietf-ntp-packet-timestamps |
---|---|---|
Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 09) | |
Type | Last Call Review | |
Team | Security Area Directorate (secdir) | |
Deadline | 2020-02-20 | |
Requested | 2020-02-06 | |
Authors | Tal Mizrahi , Joachim Fabini , Al Morton | |
I-D last updated | 2020-02-20 | |
Completed reviews |
Genart Last Call review of -07
by Russ Housley
(diff)
Tsvart Last Call review of -08 by Ian Swett (diff) Secdir Last Call review of -07 by Liang Xia (diff) |
|
Assignment | Reviewer | Liang Xia |
State | Completed | |
Request | Last Call review on draft-ietf-ntp-packet-timestamps by Security Area Directorate Assigned | |
Posted at | https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/WbIQUxpdYiTXNFu-mTfq86Oe1jk | |
Reviewed revision | 07 (document currently at 09) | |
Result | Ready | |
Completed | 2020-02-20 |
review-ietf-ntp-packet-timestamps-07-secdir-lc-xia-2020-02-20-00
Reviewer: Liang Xia Review result: Ready I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments. This document specifies guidelines for defining packet timestamp formats in networking protocols at various layers. It also presents three recommended timestamp formats. This document is well written, and the security considerations section discusses the potential security issues comprehensively, I don't see any other issues missed. In summary, I think this document is ready to go.