Last Call Review of draft-ietf-nvo3-evpn-applicability-04
review-ietf-nvo3-evpn-applicability-04-secdir-lc-rose-2022-07-11-00
Request | Review of | draft-ietf-nvo3-evpn-applicability |
---|---|---|
Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 06) | |
Type | Last Call Review | |
Team | Security Area Directorate (secdir) | |
Deadline | 2022-07-11 | |
Requested | 2022-06-27 | |
Authors | Jorge Rabadan , Matthew Bocci , Sami Boutros , Ali Sajassi | |
I-D last updated | 2022-07-11 | |
Completed reviews |
Rtgdir Last Call review of -03
by Mach Chen
(diff)
Opsdir Last Call review of -04 by Scott O. Bradner (diff) Genart Last Call review of -04 by Reese Enghardt (diff) Secdir Last Call review of -04 by Kyle Rose (diff) |
|
Assignment | Reviewer | Kyle Rose |
State | Completed | |
Request | Last Call review on draft-ietf-nvo3-evpn-applicability by Security Area Directorate Assigned | |
Posted at | https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/RP_NK0o3oJ1aPNwNSaaFMfPYNFg | |
Reviewed revision | 04 (document currently at 06) | |
Result | Has nits | |
Completed | 2022-07-11 |
review-ietf-nvo3-evpn-applicability-04-secdir-lc-rose-2022-07-11-00
I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments. This document is Ready with Nits. There are no novel security issues presented by this work. Some may present themselves in follow-up documents (e.g., in draft-sajassi-bess-secure-evpn), but this document doesn't itself describe anything new that would require security considerations beyond those of the underlying protocols and infrastructure. Nits: * Add "EVI" to the glossary. But also... * I'll amplify Scott Bradner's observation that this document would be a lot easier to read without every other word being an abbreviation.