Last Call Review of draft-ietf-nvo3-mcast-framework-09
review-ietf-nvo3-mcast-framework-09-secdir-lc-wallace-2017-10-05-00
| Request | Review of | draft-ietf-nvo3-mcast-framework |
|---|---|---|
| Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 11) | |
| Type | Last Call Review | |
| Team | Security Area Directorate (secdir) | |
| Deadline | 2017-10-02 | |
| Requested | 2017-09-18 | |
| Authors | Anoop Ghanwani , Linda Dunbar , Mike McBride , Vinay Bannai , Ramki Krishnan | |
| I-D last updated | 2017-10-05 | |
| Completed reviews |
Tsvart Last Call review of -09
by Colin Perkins
(diff)
Opsdir Last Call review of -09 by Tianran Zhou (diff) Secdir Last Call review of -09 by Carl Wallace (diff) Genart Last Call review of -09 by Christer Holmberg (diff) Tsvart Telechat review of -11 by Colin Perkins |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Carl Wallace |
| State | Completed | |
| Review |
review-ietf-nvo3-mcast-framework-09-secdir-lc-wallace-2017-10-05
|
|
| Reviewed revision | 09 (document currently at 11) | |
| Result | Ready | |
| Completed | 2017-10-05 |
review-ietf-nvo3-mcast-framework-09-secdir-lc-wallace-2017-10-05-00
I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments. The summary of the review is Ready. The draft provides additional detail for handling multi-cast vs the material in RFC7365 and RFC8014. The draft references RFC8014 for Security Considerations content, which in turn reference RFC7365. This seems fine (though I was surprised the additional depth of detail on multi-cast did not generate any additional detail in the security considerations section).