Skip to main content

Early Review of draft-ietf-nvo3-rfc7348bis-02
review-ietf-nvo3-rfc7348bis-02-rtgdir-early-halpern-2025-11-12-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-nvo3-rfc7348bis-02
Requested revision 02 (document currently at 02)
Type Early Review
Team Routing Area Directorate (rtgdir)
Deadline 2025-12-05
Requested 2025-11-06
Requested by Matthew Bocci
Authors Mallik Mahalingam , Dinesh Dutt , Larry Kreeger , T. Sridhar , Ali Sajassi
I-D last updated 2026-02-11 (Latest revision 2025-11-03)
Completed reviews Rtgdir Early review of -02 by Joel M. Halpern
Genart Early review of -02 by Peter E. Yee
Comments
This document is intended to take RFC7348 (VXLAN), which was originally published through the Independent Submission Editor, into the IETF stream, allowing the IETF to create a registry to make use of unused bits in the VXLAN header for new applications. VXLAN is very widely deployed and it is important not to impact those existing deployments. Please review from the perspective of the clarity of the specification, or any technical issues with the extensions/changes with respect to RFC7438.
Assignment Reviewer Joel M. Halpern
State Completed
Request Early review on draft-ietf-nvo3-rfc7348bis by Routing Area Directorate Assigned
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtg-dir/25_hIqvGrzSQat6MctdAC_VLlAw
Reviewed revision 02
Result Ready
Completed 2025-11-12
review-ietf-nvo3-rfc7348bis-02-rtgdir-early-halpern-2025-11-12-00
This is a Routing Directorate (early) review as requested.
Draft: draft-ietf-nvo3-rfc7348bis-02
Reviewer: Joel M. Halpern
Review Date: 12-Nov-2025

Summary: Ready, with one major but easily addressed concern

Major:
    I can not find any text describing whether there is any difference in the
    packet format or packet processing rules between this document and RFC7348.
     My guess is that there is no difference, and this document should say that
    (e.g. it could say "The format and processing described here are fully
    compatible with those in RFC 7348.)  If there are changes, those should be
    described.

Minor: N/A