Last Call Review of draft-ietf-nvo3-use-case-15
review-ietf-nvo3-use-case-15-rtgdir-lc-rogge-2017-01-15-00
Request | Review of | draft-ietf-nvo3-use-case |
---|---|---|
Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 17) | |
Type | Last Call Review | |
Team | Routing Area Directorate (rtgdir) | |
Deadline | 2017-01-12 | |
Requested | 2016-12-20 | |
Requested by | Alia Atlas | |
Authors | Lucy Yong , Linda Dunbar , Mehmet Toy , Aldrin Isaac , Vishwas Manral | |
I-D last updated | 2017-01-15 | |
Completed reviews |
Rtgdir Last Call review of -15
by Henning Rogge
(diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -15 by Donald E. Eastlake 3rd (diff) Genart Last Call review of -15 by Ralph Droms (diff) Opsdir Last Call review of -15 by Tim Wicinski (diff) Tsvart Telechat review of -15 by David L. Black (diff) |
|
Assignment | Reviewer | Henning Rogge |
State | Completed | |
Request | Last Call review on draft-ietf-nvo3-use-case by Routing Area Directorate Assigned | |
Reviewed revision | 15 (document currently at 17) | |
Result | Has issues | |
Completed | 2017-01-15 |
review-ietf-nvo3-use-case-15-rtgdir-lc-rogge-2017-01-15-00
Hi, I have been asked to review this draft as a Routing Directorate reviewer. Document: draft-ietf-nvo3-use-case-15 Reviewer: Henning Rogge Review Date: 15 January 2017 Intended Status: Informational Summary: I have no major concerns about this document. Minor Issues: The document states that the NVO3 networks can be layer-2 or layer-3 entities. While layer-2 networks leave the complete IP addressing scheme to the connected VMs/servers, a layer-3 NVO3 network will (if I understand it correctly) set some restrictions on the IP addresses of the VMs (because the addresses have to fit the routing tables used on the NVO3 network). The draft mention the use of iBGP or static routes for connecting a customer server/VM over the internet (Section 3.1), but does not mention any such thing within the NVO3 network and does also not mention the any handing of addressing. Is this 'out of scope' for this Use Case draft or should it maybe mention who is responsible for defining the addressing scheme for a layer-3 NVO3 VM? Henning Rogge