Last Call Review of draft-ietf-oauth-jwt-bearer-10
review-ietf-oauth-jwt-bearer-10-genart-lc-halpern-2014-09-18-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-oauth-jwt-bearer
Requested rev. no specific revision (document currently at 12)
Type Last Call Review
Team General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart)
Deadline 2014-09-29
Requested 2014-09-17
Other Reviews Secdir Last Call review of -10 by Radia Perlman (diff)
Opsdir Last Call review of -10 by Tim Wicinski (diff)
Review State Completed
Reviewer Joel Halpern
Review review-ietf-oauth-jwt-bearer-10-genart-lc-halpern-2014-09-18
Posted at http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/gen-art/current/msg10595.html
Reviewed rev. 10 (document currently at 12)
Review result Ready with Issues
Draft last updated 2014-09-18
Review completed: 2014-09-18

Review
review-ietf-oauth-jwt-bearer-10-genart-lc-halpern-2014-09-18

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at

<

http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
you may receive.

Document: draft-ietf-oauth-jwt-bearer-10
  JSON Web Token (JWT) Profile for OAuth 2.0 Client Authentication and
                          Authorization Grants
Reviewer: Joel M. Halpern
Review Date: 18-Sept-2014
IETF LC End Date: 29-Sept-2014
IESG Telechat date: N/A



Summary: This document appears to be ready for publicaiton as a Proposed 


Standard.






This reviewer would suggest that the General AD check with parties who 


can confirm the two notes below.






Note that the reviewer did not review RFC 6749, 


draft-ietf-oauth-assertions, or draft-ietf-oauth-json-web-token, but 


simply takes as given that the work here is consistent with that work.






Similarly, the reviewer assumes that the subtleties of 


internationalization of issuers (and any other fields that must be 


compared).  It is not obvious whether pointing to the RFC 3986 is 


sufficient, but it is not obviously insufficient.




Major issues: N/A

Minor issues:


    I presume it is clear from the underlying documents whether the 


periods at the ends of intermediate lines in the examples are supposed 


to be there.




Nits/editorial comments: N/A