Last Call Review of draft-ietf-ohai-ohttp-05
review-ietf-ohai-ohttp-05-opsdir-lc-wu-2022-12-12-00
Request | Review of | draft-ietf-ohai-ohttp |
---|---|---|
Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 10) | |
Type | Last Call Review | |
Team | Ops Directorate (opsdir) | |
Deadline | 2022-12-09 | |
Requested | 2022-11-25 | |
Authors | Martin Thomson , Christopher A. Wood | |
I-D last updated | 2022-12-12 | |
Completed reviews |
Tsvart Last Call review of -05
by Kyle Rose
(diff)
Artart Last Call review of -05 by Sean Turner (diff) Opsdir Last Call review of -05 by Bo Wu (diff) Genart Last Call review of -06 by Peter E. Yee (diff) Secdir Last Call review of -05 by Alexey Melnikov (diff) Intdir Telechat review of -06 by Wassim Haddad (diff) |
|
Assignment | Reviewer | Bo Wu |
State | Completed | |
Request | Last Call review on draft-ietf-ohai-ohttp by Ops Directorate Assigned | |
Posted at | https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ops-dir/hH9P1Glw25cpRldCaGaomSTyCC4 | |
Reviewed revision | 05 (document currently at 10) | |
Result | Has nits | |
Completed | 2022-12-12 |
review-ietf-ohai-ohttp-05-opsdir-lc-wu-2022-12-12-00
Summary: This document (with intended status Standards Track) defines Oblivious HTTP to enable an HTTP client to send requests to an origin server in a way that no single party can determine both the identity of the client and the contents of its request. This is a well written document. Major issues: None Minor issues: None Nits/editorial comments: 1. Section 2: It is suggested to add the relationship with “target resource” and “Server”. As “Server” is used in abstract and introduction, Section 2 directly uses “target resource” instead of “Server”. This is applicable to “Target Resource” definition in section 2.2. 2. Section 2 AEAD : It would be better to expand on the first use. 3. The following spelling are duplicated twice: Section 4.3: request request Section 4.4: context context Section 7: with with