Last Call Review of draft-ietf-opsawg-capwap-alt-tunnel-08
review-ietf-opsawg-capwap-alt-tunnel-08-opsdir-lc-liu-2016-11-03-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-opsawg-capwap-alt-tunnel
Requested rev. no specific revision (document currently at 11)
Type Last Call Review
Team Ops Directorate (opsdir)
Deadline 2016-10-25
Requested 2016-09-22
Other Reviews Genart Last Call review of -08 by Paul Kyzivat (diff)
Genart Telechat review of -08 by Paul Kyzivat (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -08 by Catherine Meadows (diff)
Secdir Early review of -09 by Catherine Meadows (diff)
Genart Last Call review of -10 by Paul Kyzivat (diff)
Review State Completed
Reviewer Will LIU
Review review-ietf-opsawg-capwap-alt-tunnel-08-opsdir-lc-liu-2016-11-03
Posted at http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ops-dir/current/msg02237.html
Reviewed rev. 08 (document currently at 11)
Review result Ready
Draft last updated 2016-11-03
Review completed: 2016-11-03

Review
review-ietf-opsawg-capwap-alt-tunnel-08-opsdir-lc-liu-2016-11-03






Hi all,




 




(Sorry for being late due to travelling. )




I have reviewed draft-ietf-opsawg-capwap-alt-tunnel-08 as part of the Operational directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG.  These comments were written with the intent of
 improving the operational aspects of the IETF drafts. Comments that are not addressed in last call may be included in AD reviews during the IESG review.  Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments.




 




“Control and Provisioning of Wireless Access Points (CAPWAP) defines a




  specification to encapsulate a station's data frames between the




   Wireless Transmission Point (WTP) and Access Controller (AC).




   Specifically, the station's IEEE 802.11 data frames can be either




   locally bridged or tunneled to the AC.  When tunneled, a CAPWAP data




   channel is used for tunneling.  In many deployments encapsulating




   data frames to an entity other than the AC (for example to an Access




   Router (AR)) is desirable.  Furthermore, it may also be desirable to




   use different tunnel encapsulation modes between the WTP and the




   Access Router.  This document defines extension to CAPWAP protocol




   for supporting this capability and refers to it as alternate tunnel




   encapsulation.  The alternate tunnel encapsulation allows 1) the WTP




   to tunnel non-management data frames to an endpoint different from




   the AC and 2) the WTP to tunnel using one of many known encapsulation




   types such as IP-IP, IP-GRE, CAPWAP.  The WTP may advertise support




   for alternate tunnel encapsulation during the discovery or join




   process and AC may select one of the supported alternate tunnel




   encapsulation types while configuring the WTP.”




 




I have also discussed with some of co-authors about some details of this draft. Some affiliations may need to be updated.


J







 




My overall view of the document is 'Ready' for publication.




 




 




*  Section 3.5, page 15: 




PMIPv6 is updated by RFC6543 and RFC7864. Authors may need to double check whether corresponding updates needed.




 




Regards,




Will (Shucheng LIU)