Last Call Review of draft-ietf-opsawg-capwap-hybridmac-06
review-ietf-opsawg-capwap-hybridmac-06-genart-lc-shirazipour-2014-11-10-00
| Request | Review of | draft-ietf-opsawg-capwap-hybridmac |
|---|---|---|
| Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 08) | |
| Type | IETF Last Call Review | |
| Team | General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart) | |
| Deadline | 2014-11-10 | |
| Requested | 2014-10-30 | |
| Authors | Chunju Shao , DENG Hui , Rajesh Pazhyannur , Farooq Bari , Rong Zhang , Satoru Matsushima | |
| I-D last updated | 2015-10-14 (Latest revision 2014-12-18) | |
| Completed reviews |
Genart IETF Last Call review of -06
by Meral Shirazipour
(diff)
Genart Telechat review of -07 by Meral Shirazipour (diff) Secdir IETF Last Call review of -06 by Catherine Meadows (diff) Opsdir IETF Last Call review of -06 by Nevil Brownlee (diff) |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Meral Shirazipour |
| State | Completed | |
| Request | IETF Last Call review on draft-ietf-opsawg-capwap-hybridmac by General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) Assigned | |
| Reviewed revision | 06 (document currently at 08) | |
| Result | Ready w/nits | |
| Completed | 2014-11-10 |
review-ietf-opsawg-capwap-hybridmac-06-genart-lc-shirazipour-2014-11-10-00
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq . Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document: draft-ietf-opsawg-capwap-hybridmac-06 Reviewer: Meral Shirazipour Review Date: 2014-11-07 IETF LC End Date: 2014-11-10 IESG Telechat date: NA Summary: This draft is ready to be published as Standards Track RFC but I have some editorial comments . Nits/editorial comments: -[Page 1], Abstract, suggestion: please spell out CAPWAP: "Control And Provisioning of Wireless Access Points (CAPWAP)" -[Page 1], Abstract, suggestion: "However, in the split MAC mode," ----> use "Split" instead of "split" (to review the rest of draft) -[Page 1], Abstract, remove double occurrence of "clearly": in "...not been clearly clearly defined" Also correct: "functions are not been clearly clearly defined"----->"functions have not been clearly defined" or "functions are not clearly defined" Best Regards, Meral --- Meral Shirazipour Ericsson Research www.ericsson.com