IETF Last Call Review of draft-ietf-opsawg-collected-data-manifest-09
review-ietf-opsawg-collected-data-manifest-05-opsdir-lc-boucadair-2025-01-08-01

Request Review of draft-ietf-opsawg-collected-data-manifest
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 10)
Type IETF Last Call Review
Team Ops Directorate (opsdir)
Deadline 2024-12-11
Requested 2024-11-27
Requested by Joe Clarke
Authors Benoît Claise , Jean Quilbeuf , Diego Lopez , Ignacio Dominguez Martinez-Casanueva , Thomas Graf
I-D last updated 2025-11-10 (Latest revision 2025-10-20)
Completed reviews Yangdoctors IETF Last Call review of -05 by Qiufang Ma (diff)
Opsdir IETF Last Call review of -09 by Mohamed Boucadair (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Mohamed Boucadair
State Completed
Request IETF Last Call review on draft-ietf-opsawg-collected-data-manifest by Ops Directorate Assigned
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ops-dir/zVhdBshSTafLIjrM86nZmxxhmgw
Reviewed revision 09 (document currently at 10)
Result Ready
Completed 2025-03-12
review-ietf-opsawg-collected-data-manifest-05-opsdir-lc-boucadair-2025-01-08-01
Per https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/opsawg/meFeCGxDmanXiUK287ZJu0jWGuI/,
the authors addressed all points, except this one which is subjective to WG
discussion:

> I agree about getting the discussion with the WG about facilitating
> the use of the module (i.e. aligning with the YANG catalog to retrieve
> models a posteriori) vs facilitating the implementation of the module
> (and aligning with one or more existing specs to get the details of
> the platform).