IETF Last Call Review of draft-ietf-opsawg-discardmodel-13
review-ietf-opsawg-discardmodel-13-genart-lc-even-2026-06-16-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-opsawg-discardmodel
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 14)
Type IETF Last Call Review
Team General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart)
Deadline 2026-06-22
Requested 2026-06-08
Authors John Evans , Oleksandr Pylypenko , Jeffrey Haas , Aviran Kadosh , Mohamed Boucadair
I-D last updated 2026-07-09 (Latest revision 2026-06-24)
Completed reviews Yangdoctors Early review of -03 by Ladislav Lhotka (diff)
Opsdir Early review of -09 by Sergio Belotti (diff)
Intdir Early review of -09 by Satoru Matsushima (diff)
Yangdoctors Early review of -10 by Ladislav Lhotka (diff)
Secdir IETF Last Call review of -13 by Derrell Piper (diff)
Tsvart IETF Last Call review of -13 by Michael Tüxen (diff)
Genart IETF Last Call review of -13 by Roni Even (diff)
Intdir Telechat review of -14 by Carlos Pignataro
Assignment Reviewer Roni Even
State Completed
Request IETF Last Call review on draft-ietf-opsawg-discardmodel by General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) Assigned
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/CsSwx5JvUDPdKNWtbK06BlwGs5U
Reviewed revision 13 (document currently at 14)
Result Ready
Completed 2026-06-16
review-ietf-opsawg-discardmodel-13-genart-lc-even-2026-06-16-00
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.

For more information, please see the FAQ at

<https://wiki.ietf.org/en/group/gen/GenArtFAQ>.

Document: draft-ietf-opsawg-discardmodel-??
Reviewer: Roni Even
Review Date: 2026-06-16
IETF LC End Date: 2026-06-22
IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat

Summary:
The document is ready for publication as a standard track RFC.
While reading the document I had some question regarding the parameters
selection. After reading section 6.1 the deployment expedience it became clear
to me. Good explanation.

Major issues:

Minor issues:

Nits/editorial comments: