Skip to main content

Last Call Review of draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-fixes-07
review-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-fixes-07-tsvart-lc-duke-2024-04-16-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-fixes-06
Requested revision 06 (document currently at 10)
Type Last Call Review
Team Transport Area Review Team (tsvart)
Deadline 2024-04-26
Requested 2024-04-13
Requested by Mahesh Jethanandani
Authors Mohamed Boucadair , Benoît Claise
I-D last updated 2024-04-16
Completed reviews Secdir Last Call review of -09 by Hilarie Orman (diff)
Tsvart Last Call review of -07 by Martin Duke (diff)
Intdir Last Call review of -08 by Donald E. Eastlake 3rd (diff)
Opsdir Early review of -03 by Qin Wu (diff)
Genart Early review of -03 by Behcet Sarikaya (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Martin Duke
State Completed
Request Last Call review on draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-fixes by Transport Area Review Team Assigned
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsv-art/nByyZoniu0GZwEEIfK1kn4AVa9w
Reviewed revision 07 (document currently at 10)
Result Ready w/nits
Completed 2024-04-16
review-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-fixes-07-tsvart-lc-duke-2024-04-16-00
This document has been reviewed as part of the transport area review team's
ongoing effort to review key IETF documents. These comments were written
primarily for the transport area directors, but are copied to the document's
authors and WG to allow them to address any issues raised and also to the IETF
discussion list for information.

When done at the time of IETF Last Call, the authors should consider this
review as part of the last-call comments they receive. Please always CC
tsv-art@ietf.org if you reply to or forward this review.

This document does some housekeeping on the IPFIX Information Elements registry,
to conform to a standard table format and fix other minor errors. There are no
transport protocol implications.

The reference to the port registry is correct. It might be good for PortRangeStart
and PortRangeEnd to clarify that the linked registry is not just for TCP, but also
UDP, SCTP, and DCCP.