Early Review of draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-gtpu-09
review-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-gtpu-09-opsdir-early-zhou-2026-05-31-00
| Request | Review of | draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-gtpu |
|---|---|---|
| Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 12) | |
| Type | Early Review | |
| Team | Ops Directorate (opsdir) | |
| Deadline | 2026-05-22 | |
| Requested | 2026-05-05 | |
| Requested by | Mahesh Jethanandani | |
| Authors | Daniel Voyer , Sriram Gopalakrishnan , Thomas Graf , Vyasraj Satyanarayana , Cristian Staicu | |
| I-D last updated | 2026-06-16 (Latest revision 2026-06-10) | |
| Completed reviews |
Opsdir Early review of -09
by Tianran Zhou
(diff)
Secdir Early review of -09 by Tim Hollebeek (diff) |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Tianran Zhou |
| State | Completed | |
| Request | Early review on draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-gtpu by Ops Directorate Assigned | |
| Posted at | https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ops-dir/-C87_fhyLAirJ8RjgXfiOErCqxE | |
| Reviewed revision | 09 (document currently at 12) | |
| Result | Has nits | |
| Completed | 2026-05-31 |
review-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-gtpu-09-opsdir-early-zhou-2026-05-31-00
Hi, I have been selected as the Operational Directorate (opsdir) reviewer for this Internet-Draft. The Operational Directorate reviews all operational and management-related Internet-Drafts to ensure alignment with operational best practices and that adequate operational considerations are covered. A complete set of _"Guidelines for Considering Operations and Management in IETF Specifications"_ can be found at https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-rfc5706bis/. While these comments are primarily for the Operations and Management Area Directors (Ops ADs), the authors should consider them alongside other feedback received. - Document: draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-gtpu-09 - Reviewer: Tianran Zhou - Review Date: 2026/6/1 - Intended Status: Standards Track --- ## Summary Has Nits: This document is basically ready for publication but has nits that should be considered prior to publication. Section 2 Terminology The term “Uplink Classifier” defined in TS.23501 should be added here. Section 5 IANA Considerations This sentence is not aligned with Table 1 “IANA has registered the following IEs in the "IPFIX Information Elements" registry available at [IANA-IPFIX].”, because Table 1 includes two element ID that have not be allocated by IANA. Suggest to split Table 1 into two tables, one includes the allocated element IDs, and another includes the element IDs need to be allocated. Section 9 Security Considerations Old “Implementations and operators therefore SHOULD treat this data as sensitive network telemetry.” New “Implementations and operators therefore SHOULD treat this data as sensitive network telemetry data” Old “Applications and operators using the IEs described in this document must…” New “Applications and operators using the IEs specified in this document must…” The word “described” is too general, there are some IEs described in this document but are not defined in this document, such as “transportChecksum IE 503”.